• Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      And the railways.

      That did not go well either.

      Although I’ll wager it’s still more useful than the US rail system.

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        The reason we don’t have a US rail system is because of the constant, unending efforts by automotive industries to dismantle all plans and dreams we’ve ever had for mass-transit. And every other possible public offering or social service that we pay taxes for.

  • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    At this point. How could anyone care or take seriously anything Musk or Trump spits. It’s all lies and bullshit.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Privatising literally everything has been their end-goal with ALL of this the entire time. They plaster it with conservative talking points but this entire administration is an effort by corporate forces to dismantle public services, rights and benefits, so that if you so much want to drive to the store you will have to pay a subscription to use the privately maintained roads, so you have a credit-card reader by your faucet and toilet, so that they can tax you on rainwater you’re required to have to collect rain from your gutters. (This is real in other countries.)

      The efforts towards killing public services goes way, way back and if you look at every conservative/republican legislation, it all hinges around how “bad” public services are. Public schools teaching evolution, public television for simply existing, and they’ve been massively successful and killing the regulations and oversight on things like media fairness, public health proposals, safety nets and social services, and yes they really, really want to kill our medicare and medicaid, so they can replace them with more bullshit commercial services. They won’t be happy until we stop getting paychecks we can choose how to use and we all just hand our pay right over to a number of subscription services for things they can take away if you miss a payment.

      They want us poor, they want us stupid, they want an army of slaves and if they can’t get it via racism and dehumanizing some identifiable group or population, they will just settle for full on serfdom and monarchy. Now get out there and work your lord’s fields!

    • Sharpiemarker@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean you have to take their words seriously because they tell you what they’re going to do. Or at the very least what they want to do.

  • KulunkelBoom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    He’ll find those already government run in Russia. Perhaps he should consider relocating to that shithole and leave the United States the fuck alone.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, I had no idea it wasn’t private. What’s the deal with that?

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Passenger rail was faillling across the country. Pretty much every private rail company was going out of business.

          Amtrak was the rescue plan. Sounds good right? Amtrak took ownership of a bunch of money losing routes across the US and were required to keep the nationwide service. No track (except northeast), no reliable government funding. Can’t decrease service. Can’t raise fares much. No way back to profitability.

          The additional funding signed by Biden was the way back. Currently Amtrak is profitable on the Northeast Corridor only, and that funds the rest of the system. Even that has several choke points that are over 100 years old. They desperately need upgraded infrastructure in order to function. That funding also included increased service in a few places, to try to make it useful to someone. All too much of Amtrak is useless stuff like one train per day. Of course they’re not selling any tickets

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I knew it was kinda of poorly designed, I remember the rails aren’t smooth enough for commuter traffic but we did it anyway.

              • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                It’s fine at slower speeds but the track is so old that the trains can’t go very fast. Also, most of the track in America is owned by private freight rail companies which means AmTrack has to wait for the freight trains to go by and that increases the amount of time a train trip takes.

                • AA5B@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  It also means the tracks owner has no incentive to keep things up enough to make the ride smooth or to allow fast trains. Cargo can be slow and bumpy

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      This but unironically.

      Can you imagine a presidential candidate running on the platform of seizing the assets of the billionaire class? They would transcend political parties, they would unify the nation and people would finally gain something from our politics.

      And they would probably be found with thirty bullets to the back of the head and it would be ruled a suicide.

  • itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 days ago

    They already tried this in LA with privatizing the public transportation system back in the 50’s. The big car companies bought it all and dismantled it in favor of selling their cars.

    Most of Amtrak loses money except for the NE corridor. So if you privatize Amtrak it means even worse service and eventually no trains where it is not profitable.

    Same with privatization of the USPS, it just means less services for a higher price until they decide to close it altogether because email will replace letters altogether. Say good by to any privacy since all email is monitored and capitalized for marketing.

    Fuck fElon Muskrat.

    • takeda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      4 days ago

      Exactly, we have UPS, FedEx, DHL and bunch of others.

      Leave USPS the fuck alone.

      • root_beer@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        They’re all shit too. Fat lot of good privatization would do. USPS was Cool and Good until DeJoy was dropped in to throw wrenches into the cogs.

        • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          4 days ago

          UPS is actually fairly reliable. FedEx is hit and miss depending on the driver coverage area you’re in, DHL and others just don’t even exist.

          USPS has always been great, but primarily for handling “last mile” where a lot of customers need reliable delivery of low monetary value packages like letters that UPS isn’t set to handle, but carry some of the most important lifelines of information to rural and poor Americans.

          • root_beer@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            UPS has always been hit or miss at best in my experience, but of the three, I’ll concede that it’s the least garbage. The other two have delivered packages to the wrong house—not as in like, “next door” wrong house, but as in “some house miles away” wrong house—or they sometimes just flat out don’t deliver a package and return it to the sender. If they do deliver a package, it’s rarely on time.

            As for USPS, nowadays, my wife has tracked packages to see that they are brought to our local mail sorting facility, but then for some bizarre, inexplicable reason, they’re sent off elsewhere, even to another state, before being delivered here days later than the estimated delivery date. I have no idea what the hell is happening, but it’s insane and insanely stupid. And I know who is to blame, at least with this service anyway.

            • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              DeJoy got rid of around 1/3 of the mail sorting machines, so now they have to fake it or something. They cannot keep up with the volume of mail, is my guess.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’d bet he wants to take over Amtrak so he can replace it with that stupid Las Vegas car tunnel.

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Or replace it with nothing, because “railways and mass transit are obsolete” (translation: “they’re hurting my car sales”).

    • Davin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Everything that has been privatized, has ended up costing us more for shittier service. This will not be different.

  • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    The usps is a government SERVICE. These parasites look at that and say “but nobody profits from that” and somehow they just can’t let that happen.

    • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The thing is they did generate a profit until they were fucked with by Republicans to make them look unprofitable.

      • Maiq@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        4 days ago

        There isn’t a functioning part of our government that the regressives wont destroy for private profit.

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I still can’t get over the idea of for profit prisons. incentivized incarceration is beyond stupid.

    • Airowird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Except the taxpayers benefit from it, who are the ones paying for it anyway!

      What Chancellor Musk means is that no oligarch is getting rich from it, so he is unable to understand its purpose.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 days ago

    In my country since the government privatized a part of postal service, the quality of service heavily declined to the point that now is almost guaranteed that they will “lose” your letter if you send it in a place that will cost too much to deliver

    • coaxil@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think a much smaller object with much much greater velocity it’s referable.

  • WhatSay@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    4 days ago

    You know who wants to replace the postal service? Amazon. They have delivery vehicles, lockers, and so on. They have been building towards it for years. I’m sure an attack on the postal service would leave Amazon on top, and I bet it’s a plan in the works.

    As for Amtrak, maybe musk wants to swallow it up with his boring company.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 days ago

      Actually they don’t, they want to replace fedex and UPS.

      No one wants the business of daily letter service.

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        4 days ago

        What people who want to gut the postal service don’t understand is that it’s a fucking service.

        The USPS does last mile delivery for all courier agencies. FedEx and UPS won’t pay a driver to deliver your dildo out to your cabin in bumfuck Nebraska, but the USPS will, along with your tax documents, bank statements, and anything else you need.

        If you get rid of USPS, you’re cutting anyone who isn’t in a major city off from not only packages, but critical documents.

        • vithigar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          It is insane to me when people complain about the failure of a public service to turn a profit as if that’s some kind of bad or unexpected outcome.

          Services cost money to operate for the benefit of those using them. That is literally the point.

          • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yes, the Republican con has been to compare government to a household budget and/or corporations, and it’s just so very stupid.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          nah, they’d then require someone else who takes on the private company to do it, give them 10 billion dollars to ensure the infrastructure remains and the service is provided, and then they would still refuse to do it but somehow use all the money anyway.

        • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I had to ups a document recently certified delivery but the company i was doing business with refuses to receive usps mail. It cost me $50 to send a fucking letter. I was so pissed.

  • AntY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    4 days ago

    I remember seeing an interview with Margaret Thatcher where she said that rail could never be successfully privatized. Just as a reminder of how extreme Musk’s ideas are.

    • CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Thatcher’s successor, John Major, oversaw the privatisation of British railways between 1994 and 1997.

      It only took 30 years for them all to completely collapse in 2024.

      • overload@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 days ago

        British Rail Service is so bloody expensive as well. Seems like you guys have these, essentially, per-track monopolies.

    • coyootje@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      They more or less did that here in the Netherlands. Once the government let go, things slowly started getting worse and we’re now at the point where I’d say things are expensive, occasionally sporty and suboptimal…

    • Melonpoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Japan seems to have done it, no idea what the people over there think about its service and affordability though.