Just to be clear, it’s not like the bank explicitly says “yeah, we’ll hide your money for x%”

Banks make money on fees, active management of investments, etc.

The entire issue is that half the country wants to gerrymander and the other half wants to take the high ground, kneecapping their own progress

This isn’t payments for votes though

The kid isn’t in the photo, so I’m not sure what you mean

Looking past how poorly written it is, it’s just a naive idea.

What kind of flowers are we talking about?

I was pretty drunk but it was okay ig

Republicans don’t do that in public

Huh?

I think the idea from the article was that all the info in the profile had been previously breached and leaked, so anyone could have made the profile

I think the more important question is “why is that relevant?”

I don’t introduce myself with random facts about my past. “Hi, I once kissed a man on a dare”. That’s not relevant.

Nobody has used the word “ban” though

It’s not like the article is a ringing endorsement of the product. I thought the best parts were where it pointed out how bad and overly priced it is

If you don’t reply to a random spam-y letter you get in the mail, you must be hiding something!!!1

Not really. We had already elected delegates and those same delegates cast their votes.

12ft.io works perfectly on DB

citation needed

A quick google search results in one person claiming this, seemingly without evidence.

Confirmation bias is a hell of a drug lol.

Also, isn’t the point of being an influencer that your life is making ads 24/7? Don’t they all just get paid to say shit?

To be fair, the one child policy is pretty misunderstood by most people