That’s all.

    • PlantJam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      There shouldn’t be worms in the poop of a healthy dog. This analogy just keeps getting better and more accurate.

    • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      3 days ago

      The new outlook has exceeded “garbage” and gone all the way to dumpster fire. It sometimes takes upwards of 15, 30 seconds to open an email. The new auto formatting is a hindrance to be overcome by tricking it to act how you want. Trying to schedule an event across timezones shits the bed half the time, resulting in improper meeting times being sent out. Absolute failure.

      • Gork@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        New Outlook also doesn’t support Really Simple Syndication, which I used a lot with the Old Outlook.

        So back to old Outlook I go.

      • capt_kafei@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Wait, really? I’ve found the new outlook opens emails faster than the old one, especially the HTML-heavy ones that my work loves to send me.

        The refactor to the rules UI is really nice too, the old one was so crusty. Can’t comment on the timezone issue though.

        • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’ve been told the extended time to open is related to how big the outlook database is, I average 200 emails received a day with various alerts and notifications from internal tools and it cripples new outlook in about a week if I’m not diligent with keeping folders cleaned out/emails deleted. This volume wasn’t a issue before I switched.

          • Albbi@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Ah so your issue is, let me see here… Ah, actually using Outlook like a normal user.

            I’ve tried switching to Thunderbird myself but it doesn’t support Office 365 without a third party service. So I feel stuck with Outlook.

            • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Ah, actually using Outlook like a normal user.

              Ha, right? I’m keeping my fingers crossed there is some executive at MS raging and it will get resolved before they force everyone off the legacy version. Surely there are people inside their organization with tons more traffic than I see.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I accidentally switched to it and it dropped all my non-MS mailboxes. Then when I immediately switched back it had the gall to ask me why.

    • bulwark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      If I’m being honest the only Microsoft product I actually like is Excel.

      • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        They’re doing their best to “improve” excel too… I can’t understand how their AI generated cell fill is worse than the old approach.

    • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ll die on the hill that classic outlook is far better than Gmail and similar web interfaces for email especially if you have long threads or lots of emails.

      Also somehow Google’s email search sucks so bad compared to searching in outlook.

  • Squorlple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Microsoft Teams isn’t all bad! For example, it bogged down my work computer so much at start up that I would basically get an extra break.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      It temporarily deletes my meetings just before they happen, so that I don’t have to attend them!

      Of course, when I open it later, the meetings are restored, with the original date, and no trace of the deletion. So not attending them is quite hard to explain to others. But it does save me from attending!

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Is there a Microsoft product that isn’t?

    To be fair, Teams is pretty bad even for MS. I’ve never seen something do so relatively little and still perform so poorly. When I switched jobs and got to use Slack it was like a great fog being lifted off of my being.

    • Godort@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Excel, Active Directory, and to a somewhat lesser degree MSSQL.

          • towerful@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Excel is great.
            It does so much that people make it do what it shouldn’t, and never think to explore technologies beyond it… Like a proper fucking database.
            Then you get garbage business systems based on fragile excel sheets with bonkers macros and weird ETL pipelines to sync things.
            And never try to deal with dates and timezones.

            • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Reminds me of my last job where I had to build a ridiculously complex excel spreadsheet that I copied a bunch of reports into to do scheduling because someone decided I didn’t need access to the actual data…

          • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s an awful mix of half-assed approaches to things. Awkward syntax on everything and very poor at recognizing what types of data it is handling.

            Open a CSV in a fresh Excel install. It will almost certainly mistake something for a date if the CSV is sufficiently large (unless the user is exceedingly explicit at changing settings for that particular CSV). It will reformat that data as a date, and as an added bonus, since Autosave is on by default, it’ll save that reformatted data back into your CSV. Yes, settings can be changed to avoid these things. But why isn’t it just designed better so as to avoid it altogether?

            If that was just a natural side effect of spreadsheet apps, I could understand it. But LibreOffice Calc is a million times better at recognizing what types of data it is handling, so it seems to just be Excel’s shittiness.

            The fact that it also hasn’t really changed beyond aesthetics since 2004 is just… wild.

            • jacecomix@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              Can confirm. I’ve sent csv files to my coworkers, and they’ve tried to tell me that the files I sent were invalid. It’s because they opened up the file in Excel to look at it first, and Excel autosaved the reformatted data.

    • pinkystew@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I have an old Microsoft brand thumb drive that fits perfectly into my ass and makes me nut every time

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    What blows my mind is MS fucking bought Skype and somehow Teams still can’t handle video calls correctly. The actual fuck did they do with that acquisition?

    • Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Skype used to be peer to peer. Your call went from you to your friend (whomever). Microsoft decided that they couldn’t mitm that setup to scrape data; so, soon after they acquired Skype, they made all calls go through their servers.

      Then they tried to make Skype make more money, since those servers aren’t free. Then they made teams and copied half the code into that, and cludged the rest to make it hold together.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        In mean aside from the fact that almost all of that story is completely wrong, it’s a good story.

        Source: Used to work at Microsoft and worked a lot with people from the Skype team.

          • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Skype made the call negotiation go through a central server (as does all systems). Skype was originally built on Kazaa technology to punch through firewalls without a central coordinator and that’s what Microsoft removed. They didn’t remote it to track the calling but to enable larger group calls on weaker devices which requires video mixing on a central system rather than peer to peer call (where weaker peers couldn’t decode that many video streams).

            Very very little of Skype was in the new Teams if anything. Teams was a rewrap of MSN calling tech and was a response to Slack. The real tile chatting had nothing to do with Skype either.

            Skype lingered in Microsoft for a couple of reasons; Microsoft was crap at acquiring businesses back then, thinking that a hands off approach was best. It meant Skype never really became a proper Microsoft team - they still felt and acted like Skype employees and they didn’t manage to affect Redmond very well. Being acquired is super hard especially when almost all of the bigger business was in a different time zone and a different culture.

            I was at a leadership development workshop with a tonne of Skype leaders about 10 years ago. They were still feeling incredibly frustrated and not understanding what was expected of them. It was a botched acquisition and the fault was on both sides.

          • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            They probably used Chat-GPT which at the time…

            Ok Mr Chat I need to rewrite the Skype code to look more like what we have been doing at Microsoft…

            Oh my! It keeps crashing my PC, can you do a little less crash and more icons and shit?

            Oh, it crashed my PC once more. How about this time no crash?

            Dude, I said no crash! But nice graphics! Can you make the people icons at least 25% of the total screen real estate? And can you also hide the full screen icon into at least half an hour of clicks? Yeah make it real hidden!

            Fantastic work on the full screen thing! Could you not make it like anything Microsoft has made before up to the point where it can actually run?

            Good job at sending all my information to random strangers! Many points for that! And the icons! Soo big and beautiful! Thanks Chat-GPT! Bill! We’re ready to release!

    • Magister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well, I’m a unix guy for 30 years and hated M$ bill gates blablabla and forced to use windows at work etc. Teams was somewhat bad at the beginning, especially start of covid pandemic , I’m using Teams multiple times daily for ~5 years now. But since ~1 year it handles video call pretty nicely, 20+ feeds, share screens, whiteboard, etc. it’s pretty stable at least, don’t crash anymore, and we can have multiple accounts. It took times to reach this state I agree…

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        In the past two years, I have had horrible issues where it decides that I’m not allowed to join the call because I have a Teams account logged into a different organization, that it won’t let me log out of. An issue where Microsoft servers just time out if you have ipv6 enabled, etc.

        Don’t get me started on Skype for Business. It’s still around.

        • taiyang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Oh yeah, that multiple organizations things absolutely fuuuucks me since I’m adjunct at multiple universities/colleges. It keeps trying to default me to a place I don’t even work at anymore and somehow still refuses to let me leave it without reinstalling Windows (which I won’t do as I’ll be moving to Linux full time once I do).

      • Vikthor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Teams are losing parts of text chat conversations for me. Not sure if that’s issue of their PWA on Linux or just an issue in general…

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The core of what made Skype great was made by a team of engineers in Estonia. Once it got acquired most of those people left the company. Many of them ended up at Twilio.

    • NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      There’s a huge Teams outage right now. I have to use it at work and it makes me want to jump face first into a wood chipper.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I do not believe anyone at Microsoft actually uses it because if they did there’s no way in hell that they would have let it be that bad.

      It literally keeps every single conversation you’ve ever had in a big long list on the left, with absolutely no way to organize it, categorize it, order it, or in any way manage it other than deleting history, that’s it you can delete history.

      • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Microsoft’s design philosophy in any of their products has gone from well organized menus to relying instead on a search bar. Copilot is a further addition to that design, with yet more pushes to never use a menu, but instead just tell it what you want and have it spit it back out. They want everything you make to go on OneDrive as well, so it can also be indexed this way. Teams works the same way. The big search bar at the top is unavoidable.

        Windows search is complete garbage, which you might think is a counterpoint, but instead it’s just that they only put work into having it serve results for cloud-indexed items or web results.

      • Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I know someone working there. I was in a few group calls he organised using teams where I used an anonymous login. Then Microsoft forced you to make an account to use it, so I declined after that.

      • adhocfungus@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s my primary gripe too. I could theoretically work around it if the chat search worked. I’ll try searching for a specific word to see who said it to me and when, but if it was more than a couple days ago I’m out of luck. Later I’ll remember who said it, eventually find them in the sidebar, scroll up 40 pages in the chat, and find the exact word Teams claimed it’s never heard of.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      We used to use it before switching to Google Workspace (don’t get me started on how much I hate that), and Teams wasn’t too bad. But it had two things going for it then:

      • It was replacing Skype for Business which never should existed because it was so awful. Compared to SfB, literally anything was an improvement.
      • At the time, it was basically a Slack clone that didn’t have everything and the kitchen sink bolted on yet and was decently lightweight if you used the browser version.
      • spamfajitas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m still convinced the turning point was when Microsoft deprecated Skype for Business and merged the devs from that team with the ones working on Teams. My tinfoil hat theory is they brought their garbage Lync code with them and pulled seniority to somehow jam it into the new codebase.

      • NegativeNull@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Out of the frying pan and into the fire!

        To be fair, you are right about SfB. My previous job used that

        • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Maybe I’m remembering early/beta Teams with rose tinted spectacles, but at the very least the silver lining was that I no longer needed to keep a separate Windows machine running just for work IM.

          I even tried adding it to Citrix, but it refused to install on a server version of Windows.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ve had nothing but issues with it since their “upgrade” over the last year or so. It keeps cycling between the new and old versions when I open it, it often closes itself on my PC, and every time I try to pin it to my Taskbar it disappears.

  • themachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    What’s bad about it? I’m a Linux admin by nature but an admin of all by profession and overall I have no real complaints about Teams. Has always worked just fine for me and to my knowledge everyone else.

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Slow, buggy, annoying interface, hogs extreme amounts of resources locally, can be used to spy on its users.

      What’s not to like? It’s basically how Elon envisions X, an “everything app” that is actually good at nothing specific.

    • brap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Agreed. It feels a bit janky here and there but otherwise works ok.

      But don’t get me wrong, I wouldn’t say I like it.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s missing basic features. The stuff that any normal human would assume it can do it just can’t do. It’s absolutely terrible if you use it in a large organization where you have to speak to multiple different people.

        For one-on-one conversations I guess it’s okay but the moment you try and get anything more complicated than that going on it becomes a nightmare.

    • hotspur@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I haven’t used competing apps to know, but as a forced teams user it is very sluggish, seems to break other ms apps half the time and has some strange and persistent design choices that irk me. It also crashes on its own, when I’m not using it 2-3 times a day.

      It has improved in terms of features lately, but still feels very bloated and WIP most of the time. It still won’t let me control where video windows are, and I’ll never understand this.

      This is our replacement for Skype, which was obviously feature deficient and getting old, but does what it’s supposed to do and doesn’t cause problems.

      Not sure if there’s a good competing app in terms of video and slack functionality, integration into outlook and onedrive (both of which also annoy me and seem to be performing worse-over-time, but are unavoidable and sometimes useful.)

    • magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Now it was a few years ago I used it regularly last time, but moving to Slack was a huge relief.

      One thing I remember with teams is that sending files was always a hassle. Sometimes files didn’t arrive. Files couldn’t have the same name as other previously sent files (because everything was in a onedrive folder).

      Slack has much better search. It felt like I could finally find the messages I wanted to find. With teams it was a gamble.

      And then there’s much better bot integration. At my work we have multiple bots that send messages when there’s e.g. production errors. We can then start thread discussions directly on that posts about the error, or link it to other channels to escalate the issue. And with a working search engine we can easily find the conversation again as a reference.

      It got many small things that just adds value.

  • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    well, it’s not just Teams and not just MS. Have you worked with Zoom lately? I do agree that Teams occupies that very special dark space in my heart right next to hate and loathing.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Zoom works for video. I test it a few times a week for a few hours with a few contacts each time.

      And a few beer.

      It’s a vPub most of the time with some tech thrown in.

      I hate to say it, but FB Messenger is realizable for me too : starts well, sounds good, video’s clean, ends cleanly . I need to remind mom how to start that call when it’s with her on her old portal unit, but yeah. Cambridge is the worst thing to happen to good products like M and Portal.

  • DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Fuck everything about Microsoft products. The different licenses are a nightmare, the programs are shit, and “FUCK YOU FOR TRYING TO INSTALL A PROGRAM OR USE LOCAL STORAGE” seems to be the default.

    Also I don’t trust them not to be spying on users. But sure, every government job I’ve had we used the products.