• Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    I wish there was a word for what religion, specifically in the southern section of the US, is doing to children. Like a word that describes how they are… Let’s just say grooming them.

    • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Something like this maybe?

      And I bet they add some lines to the pledge of allegiance too. They’ll squeeze Trump’s name in there somehow. After all, these people think he’s the second coming.

      • ⓝⓞ🅞🅝🅔@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s unfortunate to see all the poor dead sparrows underneath the hooves of the grotesquely obese horses. Don’t Tread On Me has taken on a new meaning.

  • ARk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    What’s the point of putting it up there if they don’t follow it?

    • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 days ago

      Enforcing religiousity has little to do with morals and more to do with control. Look at any religious state and you will find not a moral state, but one that uses religion to control other people and enforce their power.

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I can put up a poster on my property or business of the ten commandments and it’s free speech. Does the government have the same protection? Can a government entity invoke the first amendment?

        • Furball@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          The constitution lays out certain things the government can’t say or do. One of those things is bring together church and state

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          A simple reading would be no.

          “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…”

          In the strictest sense, it only applies to acts of Congress. It doesn’t even apply to states. However, the 14th Amendment setup a framework for incorporating the federal constitution down to the states, including this. Freedom of speech has also been interpreted more broadly in general.