Tinder, a dating app, has recently updated its Terms of Service. Among minor bureaucratic modifications, one major change aims to battle impersonations. From now on, Tinder will ban web developers who claim to be 'engineers'. While backend- and other types of software developers seem to be unaffected, many believe the ToS will be amended soon to include those as well.
    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      6·
      6 months ago

      Ah yes, I’ve spent decades cringing when I meet a self-proclaimed or even peer-proclaimed “rockstar”, “ninja”, “guru”, “jedi”, or probably a half dozen other “cool” designations for a tech worker.

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      31·
      6 months ago

      Ninjas, super-heroes, black-belt and terms like that are known gender-excluders. I’ve been through a couple of adjustment sessions for company standard job descriptions and it’s unreal how you can change the applicant mix by wording.

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    37·
    6 months ago

    This is a new satire site, right? These days it’s getting harder and harder to differentiate between reality and fiction in tech. The rest of their posts are pretty much spot on.

      • hansl@lemmy.world
        4·
        6 months ago

        It’s a good thing that Engineer is a protected profession and not everyone can claim it, like Lawyer or Doctor.

        In the US now it’s “oh you’re an engineer? Do you have any idea how little that narrows it down?”

        • macaroni1556@lemmy.ca
          3·
          6 months ago

          I disagree, I believe the regulatory agencies do nothing in Canada to legitimize their claim to regulating software development. Heck, they do nothing for electronics or semiconductors or anything smaller than the power grid.

          • hansl@lemmy.world
            11·
            6 months ago

            Software development is done by developers. If you are a software engineer chances are you’re working on software infrastructure that actually apply at scales that are not “add a shopping cart to this blog”.

            There are reasons you ask a civil engineer for work.

            • Slotos@feddit.nl
              3·
              6 months ago

              If you’re a software engineer, you’re applying an engineering process to the field of software development. Adding a shopping cart to a blog can be a perfectly sound solution to the problem at hand.

              Engineering becomes more important at scale, but scale itself doesn’t define engineering.

              • hansl@lemmy.world
                01·
                6 months ago

                That’s missing the point. Engineers perform at a specific level. You don’t expect civil engineers to build the bridge. Can they do it? Sure. But that’s not the profession. Same with Structural Engineers, Chemical Engineers, Industrial Engineers, etc. They are at a higher level in the planification and execution process and will likely have signatory responsibilities on the project. If the bridge falls, the engineer does have explaining to do.

                The equivalent for a software engineer would be (in the US) more at the level of architect with responsibilities higher than developers.

                But engineers is not a protected term so everyone is an engineer now.

                • UnityDevice@startrek.website
                  2·
                  6 months ago

                  That’s a very arbitrary delineation that just seems to be something you worked out backwards to support your claim. I’m an EE and software developer and I sometimes do projects involving both fields (which would be computer engineering, I guess), and there’s really not that much difference. I certainly don’t see why I would label half of it engineering and the other half not.

            • macaroni1556@lemmy.ca
              3·
              6 months ago

              You missed my point that if professional engineering societies in Canada want to take ownership of software and electronics, they better do something and not just say they’re regulating it and sit on it with no clear definition for what it even is.

              If they were doing their job, we wouldn’t need to debate what a software engineer is. They’ve let us down and they’re getting away with it.

              • hansl@lemmy.world
                0·
                6 months ago

                They’re regulating engineering of software and electronics.

                From Engineers Canada;

                In the case of software engineering, a piece of software (or a software-intensive system) can therefore be considered an engineering work if both of the following conditions are true:

                • The development of the software required “the application of a systematic, disciplined, quantifiable approach to the development, operation, and maintenance of software.”

                • There is a reasonable expectation that failure or inappropriate functioning of the system would result in harm to life, health, property, economic interests, the public welfare, or the natural environment.

                That does seem to me well defined. If you disagree then it’s okay.

                Edit: taken from this: https://engineerscanada.ca/sites/default/files/public-policy/professional-practice-software-engineering-en.pdf which also add context.

                I cannot speak about electronics as my education was in software engineering.

                • macaroni1556@lemmy.ca
                  3·
                  6 months ago

                  Not so much well defined as fancy words. There is no example of a paying software development job that has no economic impact if the software were to fail.

                  If I ran a small shopify page for goat feed, I’d be an engineer for making sure the site stayed working so farmers could order their feed. It could even put lives at risk!

                  It really only excludes someone privately working on a video game for fun.

                  So given that, what are they actually regulating? What are they providing to their members to help them become better “software engineers”. I say it’s nothing at all? +

    • soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz
      4·
      6 months ago

      I don’t take any article post or comment seriously anymore. Between the era of misinformation and advancements in AI, my trust in the internet is at an all time low.

      Make your own decisions, second guess everything

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      21·
      6 months ago

      It’s sort of based in reality. In general most software jobs are closer to technician work than engineering these days. However, there definitely are lots of software jobs which do qualify as engineering.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        5·
        6 months ago

        “web development” casts a wide net.

        The classic imagery of someone playing with frontpage back in the day, or screwing around with html in a text editor, sure. But those folks wouldn’t call themselves web developers (there was a phase over 20 years ago where anyone that cobbled together a geocities would declare ‘web developer’ on their resume, but I haven’t seen someone do that in ages).

        However, you can get in pretty deep with code running in the browser as javascript and/or wasm. Backend gives them some nested dictionary in json or protobuf and they parse, manipulate, iterate over it, sometimes making some pretty complex visualizations. Basically a ‘web developer’ is nowadays on par with any Game or GUI application developer in terms of what they might be writing. There are a few things left out of direct reach by a browser runtime, but you have access to plenty and the backend abstractions to get something in reach of HTTP are often no easier than the thing being abstracted, it’s just reframed as ‘http’.

      • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
        51·
        6 months ago

        There really isn’t. For example web browsers can execute assembly now and a good “web developer” (I’d call them a software engineer) will use assembly where appropriate.

        • Natanael@slrpnk.net
          1·
          6 months ago

          With WebUSB (supported in Chrome) and the possibility to build web applications to controls physical devices there’s definitely some web developers who can claim to be proper engineers even in the strict definitions

  • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
    141·
    6 months ago

    As a non-software engineer, feels weird that they’re making this distinction.

    I don’t have much to do with engines either.

    I take engineer to mean: designs stuff that does some task, involving SOME kind of calculation.

    Visual designer: not an engineer

    Piping designer: not an engineer (although this one felt weird, that’s what the piping designer corrected me to say, so)

    Chemical engineer: ya

    Mechanical engineer: yeah

    Software engineer: totally different flavour, but still yeah

    Language is what we want it to be.

    Web designers presumably still need to script things, I reckon that counts 👍

  • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
    9·
    6 months ago

    I perused the comments and didn’t see anyone mention this. The term “engineer” is regulated by every state in the US. I doubt they had Tinder in mind, but calling yourself an “engineer” without having a Professional Engineer license is illegal, at least when it comes to offering professional engineering services. It’s a protected title so that schools and bridges don’t get built by scammers–at least that was the intention. I can legally call myself an Engineer!

    Just go get your license, and you should be golden lol.

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    7·
    6 months ago

    Funny enough, I probably did more software engineering as a web dev than I did as a software engineer at some companies.

    In the UK, at least, the only difference typically between a web developer and a software engineer is £15-20k in salary. Frankly, we’re all software engineers…

      • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
        1·
        6 months ago

        About half of the equivalent in the US, often less. It’s exceedingly rare to make 100k here even in a senior position, although it does exist. Median is 40-50k (pounds, so times that by 1.2 for USD).

          • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            3·
            6 months ago

            Afaik it’s similar here in Germany.
            BUT you need go remember: We have social insurance and don’t need to pay 5000$ when taking the ambulance etc. etc.
            So if you exclude that we may come close if you need to see a doc on the regular.

          • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
            0·
            6 months ago

            Yes, depending on where you live rent might be similar (London isn’t much cheaper than NY or LA) but cost of living is otherwise less. Also, people tend to work much shorter hours (a limit of 37 for me, any extra is returned as PTO) and start with much more annual leave (25 days discretionary, for me, plus public holidays, plus we close over Christmas and new year’s). Furthermore there’s no health costs to pay etc. On the whole it balances out and I think the lifestyle here is better, but I do envy the extreme salaries of those in the US.

            • AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world
              2·
              6 months ago

              As someone in the US, 40 hours per week is the minimum. Recognition for “being a hard worker” has required 60+ hours at some places I’ve worked. This is for a fixed salary and no overtime pay, mind you. Then you’re usually on an on call rotation every few weeks where you may have to work off-hours if something comes up. That’s additional unpaid hours. My current company pays $80,000 USD for new college grad software developers.

              US holidays are 8-10 days, and junior devs usually start with 5-10 days of vacation. Health insurance costs at least several hundred a month (your employer also pays about 3x more than you towards your insurance premium as a benefit).

              • chakan2@lemmy.worldEnglish
                1·
                6 months ago

                You’re actually getting applicants at 80k? That’s nuts. Last I checked fresh outs were clearing 100k.

                • AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world
                  1·
                  6 months ago

                  Despite incessant reassurance from recruiting that they have the best market data and we’re paying above average, I have reasons to suspect that’s not the truth. One of them being we’re hemorrhaging mid-grade talent and focusing on hiring backfills in Ireland and Hungary for much lower salaries. It almost seems like they’re trying to offshore the dev group via attrition to work around having to do layoffs…

              • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
                1·
                6 months ago

                It’s not too crazy here :) 25 days a year is the legal minimum and I get about 10 more than that, plus a few extra from doing overtime here and there. That’s why I say the lifestyle is on the whole better here even though we don’t earn nearly as much. It’s still plenty to pay the mortgage, and Europe is right on the doorstep to spend all that holiday time in.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          1·
          6 months ago

          You made that as a senior software dev in Finance more than a decade ago, more now (mainly because the pound went down versus other main currencies), especially if you’re working in the Front Office (i.e. directly with business, such as Traders and Analysts)

          However breaking into Front Office IT in Finance without previous experience in your CV working in banking or similar is pretty though.

          • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
            2·
            6 months ago

            Sure, yes, but those kinds of positions in the US make 300k or more too. Also, then you work in finance and you have to live with the fact that you are categorically making the world a worse place every day.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        0·
        6 months ago

        Varies heavily dependent on industry, but typically less than US devs. Also if you live outside London it’s going to be a lot less.

        You average non-junior dev will probably make about 50-60k £ in london but about 25-35k £ outside london.

        Senior developer can vary heavily. in london I’ve seen 60-120k depending on language and industry.

          • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            0·
            6 months ago

            I’m a senior in the north east and I’m on 32k. But cost of living and houses are sooooo much cheaper here. I am not scraping by, I’m doing good.

            • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
              0·
              6 months ago

              I’d say you’re very underpaid, I’m making about 50% more than that in a fully remote UK-based mid-level position. You should start looking for a new job, even if it’s just as leverage to get paid fairly at your current place.

              • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
                0·
                6 months ago

                Oh yeah, I’m severely underpaid in my current job, even for where I live and what my role is. But I’m happy with my bosses and my colleagues. They’ve got my back more than not and I can be happy knowing I’m not in a hostile work environment. They are my genuine friends. Also helps that I enjoy the work I do. It’s not going to be my forever job but I’m savoring it while i can before I move on.

      • judooochp@lemmy.world
        1·
        6 months ago

        You mean you wouldn’t expect a software engineer to understand the coefficient of thermal expansion of tungsten carbide in a gas lubricated piston/cylinder pneumatic deadweight calibration system?

        Yeah, me either. But I would expect one to know how to research the documentation to find out what it meant.

        • andreluis034@bookwormstory.social
          English
          1·
          6 months ago

          Even though my job title has “engineer” in it, I don’t agree that it should be considered an area of engineering.

          Yeah, me either. But I would expect one to know how to research the documentation to find out what it meant.

          I wouldn’t even expect most of them to this kind of research, no. On top of that, I see “engineering” also carrying some type of accountability and responsibility. For example, civil engineering, there are often regulatory bodies, codes, and standards that engineers must adhere to, and they are legally responsible for the safety and integrity of their projects. While in the software side of things, standards and best practices are more loose. Unless you’re working in safety critical industries (automotive, aviation, etc…), the “accountability structure” is completely different, if existent at all. Calling themselves Software developer or some derivate would make much more from my point of view.

      • Kage520@lemmy.world
        0·
        6 months ago

        I think the idea is, most people could build a doghouse with no training, but you need planning and education to plan/build a skyscraper. If you want to write your own app at home, maybe no software planning is really required. Keep nailing in workarounds. But if you want to build a huge system, you need to do a bit more than workarounds. You need a good plan from the start to make it all efficient and in a manner others can contribute to the code base.

        That said, I feel like just having workarounds is really common even in large industry settings. Maybe I’m wrong though. I’m more of a home doghouse builder type myself.

        • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
          1·
          6 months ago

          Anyone can build a bridge. Only an engineer can build a bridge that barely stands.

          In the same way, the fact that one built a large online platform, that doesn’t necessarily mean it was built with minimal ressources and without taking past or future risk.

          Engineering is, as a profession, specifically the application of scientific principles to solve problems the right way, the first time, that is to say efficiently, and with minimal risk.

          The fact that one codes, or wields a wrench, or operates a C&C machine does not mean one is applying science to solve problems efficiently and managing risk. These are entirely different skills and professions.

  • jonsnothere@beehaw.org
    4·
    6 months ago

    As long as they don’t start building tunnels under their house because they’re an ‘engineer’…

  • Daxtron2@startrek.website
    1·
    6 months ago

    I get this is satire but people truly believe this. Web devs literally create software that runs nearly every facet of modern life.

  • invertedspear@lemm.ee
    0·
    6 months ago

    I mean, engineering is really problem solving, and not do we web developers solve problems. We may have made most of them ourselves, and new ones when we solve those, but we do solve problems.

    • Kissaki@programming.devEnglish
      1·
      6 months ago

      The term engineering is not about problem-solving, especially when differentiated from development. Engineering is about deliberate understanding and decision-making, about giving it an architecture, a structure.

      You can develop without any structure, solving an issue, without understanding a bigger context or picture or behavior. But that’s not engineering.