10 Reasons You Should Switch From Chrome to Firefox.::The best browser sync out there.
You must log in or register to comment.
11: It’s the only browser on the market that is not either apple webkit or google chrome based. And it’s in our best interest to keep said market healthy, with as many competing actors as possible.
At some point there were more than 1 relevant browsers using Gecko, though. Somebody at Mozilla decided to gloriously triumph over allies by killing XULRunner and not offering a replacement.
Not sure if WebKit is such a bad choice in that context.
The Tor browser is still Firefox based. Not a large niche, but being THE preferred way to browse with Tor makes it on its own imho
Tor browser is just Firefox with a different default configuration and add-ons though.
I just had to install chrome to book plane tickets. Kept getting an error on Firefox.
All the more reason to get more people to use it.
Try changing your user agent. What’s the error?
When I was choosing a return site it kept saying, “oops there was a mistake. It was not your fault. Try again later”.
Their mobile app sucked too, so I installed chrome to see if it would work and it did right away.
If websites don’t work on Firefox even if the user agent was changed to Chrome I recommend you to use a privacy preserving browser like ungoogled chromium.
Or find another service.
Bit hard to do that with government websites and stuff like that.
Time to emigrate! /s
How would I change the user agent? Never heard of this before, what is it?
Easiest would be to install a plugin such as “User-Agent Switcher.” This is the string of text that identifies what browser, version, and platform you’re running to the server you’re accessing.
This is the way I do it when necessary.
It’s a string that your browser sends to websites with information about the browser itself and your OS. Sometimes that info will be used to block functionality.
Years ago I tried to use TurboTax from Firefox on Ubuntu. It wouldn’t work because only Internet Explorer on Windows was supported. I changed the user agent to make it appear as though I was using a supported setup, and it worked flawlessly.
I haven’t actually needed to use one in a long time, but an extension search for “user agent switcher” should turn up something that can do it.
Thanks! I just downloaded chrome to use for this one off instance. I’m pretty degoogled, but needed to book a flight so I just needed to get it done.
There’s a new feature inside Firefox that allows you to report webpages that are broken on Firefox but work in other browsers. Please use it. It’s a great way to push for universal compatibility within browsers. It’s usually the webpage developer’s fault for using a non-orthodox technique that works exclusively on Chrome, but shouldn’t be done for any sort of reasons, like compliance with web standards. But, it’s possible for Firefox to derive intelligence from the reports and write workarounds.
The one time I have to use Chrome is T-Mobile’s site for some reason
Thai Airways by any chance? I kept getting weird errors in ff but was ok I’m chrome.
It really is telling that even Microsoft don’t find it viable to maintain a browser engine.
The “standards” are an absolute fucking nonsense, and boil down to “just do what Chrome does because nobody can stop them”.
Posting this on Lemmy is preaching to the choir.
have any instance admins ever shared the browser stats?
Removed by mod
The article mentions that “Chrome [has a] more restrictive Manifest 3 plugin API”, but doesn’t go into any examples, when this one is the main one (and why Google brought in manifest v3 at all).
Removed by mod
There’s like… no downside: all upside.
Not strictly true. Firefox gets inferior support from cloud services, like Microsoft. Newer versions of their Web apps are not available on Firefox.
But there should be no downside. It’s all artificial.
The big services purposely degrade their sites when users connect with Firefox. It’s well documented.
Unfortunately nothing is being done about it so far.
One thing I miss in Firefox is tab grouping. Yes there are 3rd party extensions that do that. But Chromium based browsers support that natively.
Sideberry is leaps and bounds better at it imo tho
Yeah, this extension is crazy good. It works as if it was native.
Agreed, and it seems like Firefox has recently made an effort to accommodate the extension more, as it seems to run even better than it used to and is now a recommended extension
You haven’t tried Vivaldi then. It has the best tab management features of any browser by leaps and bounds, it saddens me they chose Chromium over Gecko given that manifest v3 is coming.
I don’t like that Vivaldi can’t have multiple levels of grouping like you can in sideberry or tree style tabs
deleted by creator
It gives me anxiety, it’s way too overcrowded and cluttered. I use Tree Style Tab. It does one thing, it does it well, it doesn’t overcomplicate it, it works with me.
I will say it took me some time to get used to it, but it also is a lot easier to use than it used to, they made a lot of things better in the last update
I think it’s one of those things that you have to sit down and test out and really figure out. Tree style tabs are also good though. I definitely think it’s where sideberry got their inspiration
I have to use Chrome for…
-
Logging into PSN, since something in Firefox hard locks when I try it. I think it’s to do with Firefox’s password manager.
-
VR porn.
-
Some videos. Firefox doesn’t support certain video types (namely HEVC/H.265) due to patent issues.
-
No, in my experience especially the Android version of Firefox is less smooth when playing animations or scrolling on older or lower end devices.
I really hope with the new Focus on Firefox mobile, that they will iron that out.
Use Fennec instead, no issues on Android
For Android users, there’s also the Firefox-based Mull.
I prefer Fennec, Mull is too restrictive. I get the appeal, but I want some of the comforts.
Just need one reason: Google.
Imn loving floorp so far.
Does anyone have any experience with Firefox on Android?
I used it mainly for debugging sites until whichever update made it fast again recently. It’s noticeably improved.
I never got this whole “speed” argument.
I never had a lot of difference between both browsers (never got to use chrome much, admittedly), but even when it was supposedly “bad”, Firefox never struck me as being especially slow.
Was it a windows thing or what?
Thanks but I’m sticking to Brave
Meh. Been using Safari since 2012 and it’s fine.
Ah, the new Internet Explorer.
That’s silly. Safari is neither the worst browser nor the most popular one. IE was both of those things.
They probably meant from a developer perspective. It’s the only browser that’s missing a lot of CSS/JS features and needs weird workarounds for the simplest things.
Apple has been suspected to intentionally slow down safari development in some key areas so it won’t cannibalize the AppStore. Frustrated web devs, unable to get their web apps to work correctly on safari mobile, would publish their apps in the AppStore instead of using PWA.
That has been mostly solved by Apple in the most Apple way possible. They just forbade PWA on iOS. Period. Like, they still load on Safari, but you can’t pin it as a pwa to your app drawer anymore.
Slowing down web development good, but not like that.
Did you read the article at all?
Yes. Firefox is my backup for the 1-2 websites I encounter per year that don’t work with Safari.
