This article does a much better job of describing what happened. Does not make the cop look better.
Authorities were heard asking the man – “May I help you, sir?” – at first but as soon as he was engulfed in flames they started yelling at him to get down on the ground. They even drew their guns on the burning man before someone pushed them to get fire extinguishers to extinguish the fire.
Edit: What damn freedom in those moments though. I mean you can yell at the guy engulfed in flames all you want with the threat of ending his life, but he knows he’s already ended it.
Fuck you I won’t do what you tell me, indeed. I wish the man had chosen another way to protest, but WTF does he give a shit about threats from a fucking cop at that point?
Independent of what I think about the Airman’s actions, there’s a legitimate risk that he came prepared to go down fighting. Can’t really blame the secret service for playing it safe.
It someone is committed enough to a cause to set themselves on fire, who the fuck knows what else they’re willing to do? Who in their right mind would not treat the situation with caution?
The guy was trying to make a point. Is it unreasonable to assume he might try to make the point another way if the original plan doesn’t work out?
There was a car chase in LA in the late 90s. The truck being chased stopped on an overpass. The driver lit himself on fire. Then he jumped out and ran around because he was on fire. Then he grabbed a gun from his truck and shot himself in the head.
if it’s such a huge risk then why is it impossible for you to mention a single example of someone on fire shooting a cop? let’s all go around making up hypothetical situations that have never previously occurred to excuse our wrongdoings
I think you are right. Somebody who lights themselves on fire could try to ignite other people. The cops are just following their training and trying to make sure that the guy doesn’t try to harm others.
And saying the cops are cowardly for this behaviour doesn’t really make sense, I don’t think. They’re thinking the guy could try to hurt others, so they’re prepared to stop that.
No limit to their cowardice.
This article does a much better job of describing what happened. Does not make the cop look better.
Edit: What damn freedom in those moments though. I mean you can yell at the guy engulfed in flames all you want with the threat of ending his life, but he knows he’s already ended it.
Fuck you I won’t do what you tell me, indeed. I wish the man had chosen another way to protest, but WTF does he give a shit about threats from a fucking cop at that point?
In the uncensored video it’s obvious that the body he’s pointing a gun at could not move if it wanted to.
I would call that either confusion or stupidity not cowardice.
I would call it cowardly and inhumane to the point of being satirical.
Like that sounds like a depiction of an American police officer in a North Korean sketch comedy.
Keystone cop.
Nah, dude, the firs response of the police is to threaten to murder fellow citizens. And here you are on their side.
Independent of what I think about the Airman’s actions, there’s a legitimate risk that he came prepared to go down fighting. Can’t really blame the secret service for playing it safe.
If someone lights themselves on fire it’s far past the point where a gun will help lol
deleted by creator
and you think the most effective way to stop fires is with a gun? fucking fire extinguisher man jesus christ
It someone is committed enough to a cause to set themselves on fire, who the fuck knows what else they’re willing to do? Who in their right mind would not treat the situation with caution?
The guy was trying to make a point. Is it unreasonable to assume he might try to make the point another way if the original plan doesn’t work out?
He’s literally on fire. It’s unreasonable to assume he’s going to do much of anything, what with being on fire.
There was a car chase in LA in the late 90s. The truck being chased stopped on an overpass. The driver lit himself on fire. Then he jumped out and ran around because he was on fire. Then he grabbed a gun from his truck and shot himself in the head.
That kinda proves my point. There’s no “what else they’re willing to do” after they’re already on fire. There’s no next step in the plan.
Except shoot people. Definitely no reason to draw your gun.
You think someone on fire is going to be able to accurately use any kind of weapon? Let alone a gun?
so the example proving that you should point a gun at a person on fire is that otherwise he might kill himself even faster than the fire will.
Removed by mod
Yes, everyone but you is uneducated on the risks of being around people who set themselves on fire and then shoot other people.
if it’s such a huge risk then why is it impossible for you to mention a single example of someone on fire shooting a cop? let’s all go around making up hypothetical situations that have never previously occurred to excuse our wrongdoings
Yeah, I just stopped replying to this thread. It’s amazing how stupid people can be. Heavy breathing troglodytes sounds about right.
I think you are right. Somebody who lights themselves on fire could try to ignite other people. The cops are just following their training and trying to make sure that the guy doesn’t try to harm others.
And saying the cops are cowardly for this behaviour doesn’t really make sense, I don’t think. They’re thinking the guy could try to hurt others, so they’re prepared to stop that.