• I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    The Houthis attacked international trade ships, including US trade ships. Why should the US not be involved?

    • Nudding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      50
      ·
      8 months ago

      I thought they attacked because Biden is supporting a genocide. If that’s the case more power to them.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s a very convenient excuse for them, yes. Too bad none of the ships they are attacking are aiding Israel in any way or it would be more believable.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          8 months ago

          They’re too indiscriminate, that’s for sure, but to say none of the ships they’re attacking have anything to do with Israel is just wrong. Israel is currently freaking out over the lack of Red Sea trade.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’m sure they are, along with every other nation that does trade on the Red Sea. What genocide is Eritrea committing right now?

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              8 months ago

              I’m sure they are, along with every other nation that does trade on the Red Sea.

              Israel particularly is dependent on red sea trade, since it’s literally next to them. Again, I do acknowledge they’re too indiscriminate, but you can’t deny the results.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                The results of probably bankrupting Eritrea? Because I’m pretty sure they don’t deserve that.

          • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            They’re more precise at messaging and delivering the pain where it is best applied than most of the climate protestors.

      • ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        No they shouldn’t. However, the houthis are still the aggressor in this situation. They are attacking international shipping in international waters, and blaming America for their own actions. To say it is the fault of the US that ships are being attacked in the Red Sea (as you are so heavily implying) is pretty fucking naive, not to mention irresponsible.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              8 months ago

              Firing at ships. If they were firing directly at civilians there’d have been at least a few deaths, but there haven’t. They’re sabotaging economic supply lines to a genocidal state, part of the reason Israel’s economy has slumped almost 20%

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          43
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          The Houthis were not attacking all ships. They were only attacking ships connected to Israel, the US got directly involved to defend Israel. Now they’re attacking US and UK ships too, but only because of the unlimited support and defense for Israel.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            They were only attacking ships they claim were related to Israel, no one with a brain stem should believe them. We already know for a fact they weren’t.

            • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              8 months ago

              Actually if you do a little reading you’ll find out that they are. Ownership of large vessels is intentionally convoluted so as to lower the tax burden of very wealthy people, so when people without a brain stem see a Marshall Islands flagged ship they say “wElL tHAt a’iNT isRaEL tHEm hOOtiES is atTAcKin uNdiSCRiminiTLikE!!1” but actually, well just check it out below.

              https://suppo.fi/comment/2333753

              • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Link is dead so im gonna list the attacks I looked into and still remember.

                So those 2 Russian oil tankers were actually owned by Israel? A few other “connected to Israel” ships I remember were 1 officer on board a UK ship was from Israel and some business guy was a member of the board in the company that owned another ship. The vast majority of ships getting attacked have come from or gone to Saudi Arabia and India.

                They are just doing Somali pirates 2.

          • KISSmyOS@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            Got it, when Houthis attack British civilian ships, it’s the Jews’ fault.

            /s

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              30
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              🙄

              It’s the UKs fault for the unlimited support and defense of Israel’s genocide (not “the Jews” but specifically the settler-colonial Zionist entity literally created from the British mandate). We supposedly have a duty under the genocide convention to prevent genocide, after all.

          • sugarfree@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            They don’t get to launch missiles at any ships lol, that’s terrorism regardless of their stated motive.

          • festus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            They literally hit a ship a while back heading to Iran - they “say” they were only targeting ships to Israel but in practice they’re targeting every ship that goes through the area.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Is the admiral in charge of that decision? Are the crews of the trade ships in charge of that?