Summary

Vivek Ramaswamy, recently appointed to lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has proposed defunding federal programs that lack current congressional authorization.

This could affect programs like veterans’ healthcare, NASA, and early education initiatives, which still receive funding despite expired authorizations.

Ramaswamy argues that cutting these programs could save billions, and he’s committed to targeting expenditures that “don’t advance the interests of American citizens.”

DOGE, co-led by Elon Musk, aims to curb government spending, with Musk estimating potential cuts of up to $2 trillion.

  • Cris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    2 days ago

    As a US citizen, paying for veterans healthcare and early education programs advance my interests a whole fucking lot more than paying this jackass.

    Stupid piece of shit, you don’t speak for us.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I know what you mean but he does, quite literally, speak for us now. This is what we asked for.

      • Cris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        2 days ago

        I sure as fuck didn’t, I voted against every single fascist asshole on my balot. I’m just angry.

        • Kalkaline @leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          Thanks for voting. You’re justified in being angry. There’s a lot to be angry about. Right now we need to focus on blocking every action of this government. We need to shine a light on candidates doing the right thing and bring them up to positions of leadership.

            • MonkRome@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Pick an issue, or a few, you care about. Find the local or regional group that is already fighting for that issue. Join their newsletter. When they have events or meetings near you, go. Meet people and network. Someday you will find a way you can help in a way that fits your skill set, say yes.

              It really is that easy to get involved, and these organizations need volunteers way more than they need money. People make the world move forward, not money, not votes. I mean voting and giving helps too, but giving your time is often way more important with activism.

                • MonkRome@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  One more thing I might suggest is to start attending some of your town/city council meetings. You can also ask the clerk to put you on their mailing list for meeting minutes. Some have a sign up on their website. Just getting a feel for what your locality is dealing with can help you to understand what the local issues are. Local politics are often more accessible to change.

              • Cris@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                This is an unusual question, but do you know any way I can get more involved if I’m not awake when people meet and organize?

                I have a severe circadian rhythm disorder and as a result am not awake during the day. All I’ve been able to come up with in terms of contributing is writing cards to potential voters (I got a couple in the mail when I updated my voter registration), and maybe calling potential voters on the other side of the country who are in a different timezone.

                I feel really powerless to contribute, but I don’t wanna sit back and do nothing, disability or not :( if you can’t think of anything, that’s okay, I will keep looking for ways to be involved

                • MonkRome@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Voting is a small part of political change, it needs to be done but that’s not where the work is. Getting involved in your community and pushing for changes is far more productive, activism of all types.

                  I would start by getting on mailing lists for things you care about and email for local city council meeting minutes. You might be surprised by some of the meeting times of local orgs. Some events are evening, but you can still learn about what is needed if you are staying engaged with local things. I can’t tell you what will work, but I reiterate I would start by getting on mailing lists for things you care about and take opportunities when they come.

                  Edit: and don’t be so hard on yourself, you can only do what you can do. Take your wins when they come and focus on those.

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          So did I but unfortunately we lost. That’s democracy in action. The country we live in (the collective we) asked for this.

        • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Collectively protest the most American way possible. Stop buying anything but the essentials. Don’t cut out life enjoyment, but make sure it’s for as few dollars as possible. This fucks with the supply chains and their precious stocks.

  • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    3 days ago

    As someone with just as much federal authority as the non-existent DOGE, I also propose defunding expenditures that “don’t advance the interests of American citizens.”

    And I would like to start with fucking Vivek Ramaswamy and Elon fucking Musk.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      3 days ago

      as equal authority, I propose we just lock them up.

      I’m sure we can find something to actually justify it. Like, you know, betraying classified secrets to the russians, as well as providing intelligence and military aid;

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 days ago

        If we’re all just doing things without authority, why does it even need a legalized justification? Home Depot sells dog cages and padlocks.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Because kidnapping is one thing and seeing them convicted is another.

          I want him convicted in a court of law. Legitimately.

          All of these stupid fucks, to be clear. Musk. Trump. Vivek. There’s a long list of assholes that need some justice.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            I want him convicted in a court of law. Legitimately.

            And I want a pet pig that flies. There’s nothing legitimate about how the US courts treat the rich and powerful.

            Even the ones that get convicted tend to go to cushy Club Fed prison resorts unless they mess with the money of other rich and powerful people like Bernie Madoff did.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          And now you’ve circled back to exactly why this Department isn’t “non-existent” or “made up” or whatever. “Legal justification” is moot now.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          grab a shovel and start digging. Also, bring the tigerbalm, there’s gonna be a lot of nasty shit.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        if elon lied on immigration forms, strip his citizenship, seize his wealth and assets ‘earned’ after committing that crime, and kick him tf out.

      • boydster@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Wait long enough, and neither will pass the nationalist purity test. The leopards will turn inwards for face-eating sooner than some fasc-allies think, I suspect

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Remember when if you didn’t “support our troops,” Republicans would ask you why you hated America?

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The good old days when it was republicans who were “if you’re not with us I will enjoy watching you die”

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      At best, “support our troops” was a version of that dumbass magical thinking that, in earlier times, held that the U.S. lost in Vietnam because Americans didn’t clap for Tinkerbell, err, I mean, support the war. Mostly, it was a thought-terminating cliché.

      Yeah, as you rightly point out, it was never about the soldiers themselves.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        “Lost in Vietnam”? Oh, no, they were saying much worse than that. It used to be that if you suggested the US lost Vietnam that you were “insulting the bravery of the troops” or some shit like that. It was only after the War on Terror became unpopular that you could say the US lost Vietnam (because, you know, it did) without some jackass wingnut bringing out the faux patriotism.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I learned the ugly truth of that way back in 1990 when I was still in Middle School and Bush Sr. sent Americans to die for oil in Iraq and all of his fans in my town were tying yellow ribbons around the trees in their yard to “support the troops” being sent to die pointlessly.

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Any woman or veteran or union worker who voted for Trump is going to have a serious case of buyers remorse. I am none of those things but still voted for Harris because it seemed like the responsible thing to do, lesser of two evils. Way lesser it seems.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Touching NASA very well might be the thing that finally pushes me to actual violence.

    Scientific endeavors, but specifically research and exploration of space are pretty much the only things in life I really have a passion for.

    • WashedOver@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      The last conservative government silenced the government scientists from discussing climate change and destroyed decades of research as they didn’t believe in it and it didn’t fit their Alberta oil jobs first objectives.

      We are looking at another Conservative government coming our way again in the next year and it’s going to be a super shit storm when our Cons and the US Cons are firing on all cylinders destroy everything they don’t like or believe in. I fear it’s going to take decades again to come back on the science again.

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      NASA is and has always been a way for the US to maintain a literal military high ground. If it gets defunded, I don’t think you’ll have to resort to violence, our rivals will do it for us.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Back in the day they funded NASA because they were worried about being eclipsed by the USSR. Now they may worry about belong eclipsed by China. But yes they might move a shit ton to spacex.

  • Noite_Etion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    America: Our soldiers are heroes!

    Also America: But they don’t deserve a penny and should pay exorbitant prices for healthcare…

    I know this isn’t all Americans, but it’s more than I thought.

  • fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    I am terrified at them defunding the VA. I’ve had a much easier time getting good medical care from VA doctors than I ever did going private and I’d be bankrupt without the VA. It’s because of the VA that I have any savings at all

    • 🖖USS-Ethernet@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Agreed. They must have gotten better in the last decade too, because I don’t see the horrible things that people have said about the VA. Yes there are long wait times for appointments, but that’s happening in private care now as well.

  • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This is amazing. Good. Fuck the troops. Let’s see you garrison your military bases in every other country in the world, losers. You can’t even meet recruiting goals now!

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    “This bloated liberal socialist program is inefficient and doesn’t work. Because it’s liberal and socialist. So we’re going to get rid of it. We’re planing to plan a replacement plan, but we haven’t planned on when to plan it. But we’ll blame the libs for that too, even though we have essentially captured all branches of the government at this point.”

  • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Part of me, as an outsider looking in with abject horror, wants to see this happen just because I still hold out hope that it might finally wake up a not-insignificant part of rural and rust-belt America that live off these benefits (or ‘handouts’ according to the GOP) out of their political stupor.

    But on the other hand, I know that once it’s gone, it’s very unlikely to be brought back in the immediate future by the current crop of Dems, who seemingly would rather keep dangling it as a carrot (along with restoring ablation access) in order to entice voter turnout.

    • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      If it’s gone it’s gone. Those people in rural America who live off handouts and vote R can live with the long term consequences. The only way you will see a change is if they are no longer insulated from the consequences of their actions. Fox News Propaganda is going to be spinning itself in circles to justify why their “gubment program” was ended under Trump.

      Perhaps they will vote blue in the future and we will have enough of a majority that more liberal policies can be enacted.

  • pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Okay I agree with the other comments here but I’m a bit confused on this.

    How are we still spending money on these things if congress doesn’t approve it? The legislature sets the budget, did they just forget to make it official and extend these? Also why even have a phase out period in the first place?

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I think it’s because there is a difference between the Budget and Appropriations in Congress. The budget is a plan, where programs are authorized and an overall budget is set. The appropriations process is what assigns particular dollars to particular discretionary programs. (Certain programs deemed “mandatory” by Congress, like Social Security, Medicare, and interest on the debt, get allocated money automatically and are not involved in appropriations)

      If I had to guess, I would say that once a program is authorized once under a budget, it can continue as long as it (or the Federal department it is part of) is not specifically de-authorized, and as long as it continues to receive appropriations specifically for that program.

      So, it is likely that this is all about Ramaswamy’s total ignorance of how Congress works. Which tracks pretty well with what this DOGE is all about.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        So, it is likely that this is all about Ramaswamy’s total ignorance of how Congress works. Which tracks pretty well with what this DOGE is all about

        How Congress worked.

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          It still works that way, until the rules change. Republicans have the votes to change how Congress works, if they act in unison. But they will have just a slim a margin as last time, and they had trouble electing a Speaker. Even in the next Congress, they needed a secret vote to elect the Senate Majority Leader because they didn’t want any receipts on who voted for whom to make it back to Dear Leader.

          It is possible that the Republican Party turns into a oroboros of spite, eating itself from within because of perceived grievances. That might be the best possible outcome we can hope for.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Did the rules need to change to allow a convicted felon to become President? Why would they need to change for anything else?

            Fascism means “might makes right,” and Trump will be commander in chief of the US Military. Which, by the way, is larger than the next 9 largest combined (I believe, gonna double check real quick)

            Edit: yarp. Next ten countries combined actually: https://www.pgpf.org/chart-archive/0053_defense-comparison

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    We can’t be taking care of Veterans that is way to decent of a thing to do for Republicans.

  • pivot_root@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    I expected NASA to get screwed by DOGE. What I didn’t expect was that it’s at the behest of Ramaswamy instead of Elmo. 2024 is defying expectations yet again.

    • valaramech@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      NASA gives SpaceX fat government paychecks. He doesn’t want anything to happen to them.

      • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        I dunno I disagree. I think he’d like nothing more than if NASA just completely disappeared. I’ve thought that since the second they started talking about him guiding fiduciary spending. Once NASA is out of the picture, it’s all SpaceX all the time. Trump is already most of the way there anyway. “His rocket company is the only reason we can now send American astronauts into space.”

        This is part of the plan I suspect.

        • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yep he doesn’t want NASA to steal his thunder with the first manned moon landing since the Apollo program. NASA’s Orion is competing directly with SpaceX

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I don’t think he actually cares much about achieving anything spaceflight related. The guy has been hyping up his companies by holding big events for technologies ready in “X years” and consistently failing to deliver on either deadlines, tangible progress, quality, or sometimes all three of those.

            I’m under the impression that E-con Musk sees a golden opportunity to use his undeserved status as a competent inventor and businessman as an opportunity to redirect government funds into his own pocket.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Are you guys for real?? They will literally just cut out the middleman and give all the work to SpaceX instead. Jesus Christ people, read a history book about fascism.

        Man, so many people are in for a rude awakening come January, when they realize that their understanding of the previous world order is completely obsolete.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Not necessarily. He wouldn’t want anything to happen to the funding that ends up going to himself. He would likely be thrilled if their funding for designing and building their own rockets dried up, though.

        It’s right in line with the purpose of DOGE and an easy sell to anybody that doesn’t immediately see the conflict of interest: “Why are we spending $100 million annually to play catch-up with the private sector? Reallocate $80 million to get rockets that work today and save the taxpayers $20 million while doing it.”