And yet I still can’t believe it’s not satire

I’m sorry but I’m not playing. Kurzgesagt has already caused me enough of an existential crisis.

I’m sure it will be quality though!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oh-My-God_particle

Why not use tranquilizers? Field biologists use them to check up on wild animals, why can’t they use them on “criminals”?

My southwest flight will be on a max 8 both ways. Wish me luck.

If you don’t maintain your fleet, eventually they’ll all fall out of the sky

Ah helldivers my beloved

Thisis what the nazis would’ve looked like if they were Asian or black

I don’t get it. When does it become morally acceptable to block traffic?

Between Just Stop Oil and Stop Arming Israel, they both have equally valid points. So why is it that blocking the Golden Gate Bridge is “based” while blocking various feeder roads in Britain makes you a twat?

Edit: messed up the titles

I think the point was that her voice cracked and it was a comparatively mid halftime show

Just like the good ol’ days after 9/11

Testout labsim is where you’ll learn all the stuff you need (if you don’t just go to youtube). You’ll have to order (or redeem) your tests through comptia themselves.

Source: Took the test last year for A+ and Security+

Because it that case, you wouldn’t be able to slash any more tires.

It’s also not fun to be dead

Another interpretation, and an interesting catch-22, is that they are simultaneously the best and worst contenders for presidency. The act of wanting the presidency warrants at least some ulterior motive, but also requires at least learning how to run a country at the bare minimum. Without the latter, you just can’t run a country.

Yes and no. On one (nihilistic) hand, you live to die. The other hand (the better one) is that you give your own meaning to live. Fill in the spaces between the living, dying, and suffering parts, to make them seem insufficient in comparison. Just like the time you spent with your cat.

Nothing makes either side any less true - it’s all up to interpretation. For your mental health, though, it’s better to follow the latter.

It could also be the fact that a lot of modern presidents aren’t fit for presidency as much as they can mislead the people. In a perfect world, you could’ve voted for Nader and not regretted it, because you’d have known that the people that surrounded you weren’t naive. Personally though, I feel like raeganomics was to blame for too many of America’s problems.

An agenda for who? I’m very interested in who you think I am.

Yes. Albeit, I never mentioned anything about speech. It’s a bit weird that they immediately jumped to that. I’m mostly mentioning the fact that his senior moments severely outweigh other presidents. I mean, come on. The guy is 81.

I just don’t get how people are driven to pick the lesser of two evils when there’s much better options out there.

He has a card for meeting with ambassadors which literally says, in short form, “sit down. Say hello. Answer questions. Leave”.

He forgot how to stand on a bike. Hell, he forgets how to walk up stairs sometimes. Even walking on the ground, he sometimes ignores secret service instructions. He’s 81. 81. And I’m getting flak for calling him out?

I can get people defending Greg abbot for being disabled, because that’s not the point of his dilemma. This is different, because he is literally too old to be fit to serve.

Edit: I also never said anything about speech, where were you getting that from?