• Omega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    2 and 3 are clearly saying don’t be antisemitic, even if it’s aimed at Israel. Antisemitism is still bad. Although, lots of people deal with double standards outside of protected biases. (Literally anyone taking land from anyone. If anything, Israel has benefited from double standards.)

    5 is actually adding a distinction. You can’t blame random people for another country doing stuff. I fail to see how this one is bad at all.

    1 and 4 are worrying though. As you said, self-determination is fine. But you should be able to criticize actions. Banning that is a clear violation of the constitution.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      My primary point is that they aren’t eleven about Jews or Judaism, but about Israel, and the language explicitly conflates the two.

      I’m not against several of the points although I do take issue with a few of them.

      But it can’t be said that this definition doesn’t conflate Judaism and Israel. It uses the words independently