Last time I did a pickup from Asda I didn’t check my substitutions properly.
I had ordered a curry deal, 4 items for a tenner. Ordered 2 curries and 2 rice. Thought they had substituted the rice for a different rice but they had substituted the curries for rice.
So I paid a tenner for 4 microwave rice portions and nothing to go on it.
I felt like Asda had just reached into my pocket and taken an orange note out of it. Bastards
This is entertaining but I’m not convinced it was written by a human.
The article is from the guardian ( a reputable UK newspaper) reporting on an article by ‘Which?’ a UK consumer magazine with some very specific standards. The Which? Press release has citations.
Ok but it doesn’t read like something a human would write.
Maybe it was a substitution? 🙃
It reads very normally for a minor interest story in the UK.
Mushrooms are basically the opposite of a tampon. Mushrooms are almost all water. Can’t absorb much.
Always, always, ALWAYS select “do not substitute” for everything. Substitutions always cost more and I’d rather go without than take my chances on what they charge me for.
I’ve never paid more for substitutions and sometimes the swap is quite the upgrade.
I have heard of this phenomenon, but I still don’t understand how this happens. I can understand if someone grabs e.g. a can of pears instead of a can of peaches. But getting beer instead of washing powder? Does nobody actually read the customers shopping list?
The Packers are generally on minimum wage. When something isn’t in stock, the computer automatically offers an alternative. The packer can either follow the suggestion, or use their judgement. If they blindly follow the computer, they can’t be criticized. If they use their judgement, and a customer complains, then they are blamed. They really have no reason to stick their neck out, even if the computer is being idiotic.
They don’t get paid enough to care.
I will be disappointed if the tampon replacement mushroom strain isnt penis envy
