floofloof@lemmy.ca to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 months agoSupreme Court restores Trump to ballot, rejecting state attempts to ban him over Capitol attackapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up15arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court restores Trump to ballot, rejecting state attempts to ban him over Capitol attackapnews.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square35fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-24 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareDigitalFrank@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoI’m neither a Constitutional scholar nor a lawyer. I’ll go with Marbury v Madison as who gets to decide those finer points. And they decided 9-0.
minus-squareChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-24 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareDigitalFrank@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months ago their own ballots Not federal ballots. Except a state tried here and got slapped down 9-0. Seems to me it was deemed unconstitutional by the folks that decide that sort of thing.
minus-squareChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-24 months agodeleted by creator
deleted by creator
I’m neither a Constitutional scholar nor a lawyer. I’ll go with Marbury v Madison as who gets to decide those finer points.
And they decided 9-0.
deleted by creator
Not federal ballots.
Except a state tried here and got slapped down 9-0. Seems to me it was deemed unconstitutional by the folks that decide that sort of thing.
deleted by creator