• z00s@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Education is, unironically, the best tool to combat inequality, but the effect only kicks in after the students have finished school.

      In the meantime, uniforms cut down on bullying. What else do you want them to do? They don’t have a magic wand, nor do they have magic money to hand out to struggling parents.

      • Redditquaza@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        In the meantime, uniforms cut down on bullying.

        Do they? I don’t think so, people are just gonna get bullied with different “reasons”, it’s not really about the clothes after all.

        • Fleppensteyn@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I never saw someone got bullied for their clothes in my environment.

          But kids got bullied for wearing glasses, let’s hope they ban those then. Also, better to not let kids with weird accents in school. Wouldn’t want to provoke the bullies.

          • Sodis@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            So you got rid of one reason to bully, so bullies shifted to other stuff. How does this help now? Are there some studies, that prove school uniforms lead to quantitative less bullying? If yes, I would be interested in that.

            • brainrein@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Maybe we should seriously address the issues of the individual bullies. Instead of just banning them from school for a week. And teach the teachers how to do that. Maybe we should start creating a public school system that’s able to take care of the kids.

              I am sure there are quite a lot of teachers with good ideas, maybe the lawmakers should listen to them. Although mandatory uniforms likely might turn out as being cheaper, especially when the parents have to pay for them equally, whether they’re rich or poor.

              • z00s@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Well you sound like you know more than all those other people, why don’t you let them know about your expertise?

      • scrooge101@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        There is enough magic money to distribute if France (and every other country) would tax the rich.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s not even true. Children can differentiate between the cheap and expensive uniforms

        • Rubanski@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Aren’t they provided by the school? Or can you have a super high class tailor make you a uniform? I have no idea about school uniforms.

      • bouh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Maybe instead of throwing money for uniforms it could be used to hire teachers, repair the building, or buy furnitures? Just a couple of ideas you know…

        • madcaesar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          You’re missing the point. None of those things would help poor kids not appear poor and get bullied.

        • trolololol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Do the whole pay for the uniforms? Here in Australia parents do, and it’s ridiculously expensive.

          • z00s@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Ridiculously expensive? I’m in Australia too, how much do you think they cost?

            • trolololol@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Primary is affordable cause you just go into bigw

              Secondary, the blazer alone is like $400 and there’s only one store where you can get it. Eventually he’ll lose it and we’ll have a big discussion about money.

                • trolololol@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Mate, welcome to port Melbourne college. I may be off with the exact number on the blazer but a basic set of uniform with 3 shirts, pants an single blazer was close to 1k . Nitpick as much as you want but I have the receipts and they are hurtful.

                  Add to that a laptop, because port Melbourne primary used iPad but nooo, not enough for college.

          • bouh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            There’s no good option for it : either the parents pay for the uniform and it’s a tax fir the poors, or the government pay for it and the money would be far better spent on teachers and stuff.

    • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Nah they like fancy clothes better, they know it will work. In the meantime, they will also cut 8000 jobs from education too.

  • GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    If the uniforms are provided, with needed accessories to be worn correctly, then sure.

    If it’s just an “affordable” vendor, then meh.

    Fines only work on the poor, and a not-free but mandatory uniform simply acts like a fine for being poor.

    • Ziggurat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Bases on the news, a basic kit is provided. What worries me is the only 2 polo shirts part. (but a blazer jacket because they have their priorities right). I can’t see how family will keep them clean without buying extra ones. Not a problem for kids from middle class and above family who have access to a dryer and an afford a couple of “same colour polo shirt” which "should do the trick as part of an uniform assuming the principal isn’t a asshole). But if you’re from a poor family, where clothes need 3 days to dry on a rack. They’ll be the stinky dirty kid

      • Kornblumenratte@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        In most climates, clothes will dry in 1 day. Still – 3 is the absolute minimum: 1 to wear, 1 to wash, 1 to dry.

    • Weslee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Oh look, the far right pretending they care about children again… Let’s see… I’m gonna bet on some minister has some shares in a clothes factory somewhere

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not just provided, but also provided in sufficient amounts. And ideally with a comprehensive replacement policy. If you give just one then there will be problems when it needs cleaning or if it gets damaged.

  • Devi@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I was on board until I heard it was the far right, those guys and uniforms have a bad history.

  • Unrelated@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    Apart from all the other points made here, I always wonder why uniforms have to look like there has been no development in clothing/fashion for the last 100+ years? Why do they have to look like they are extras on a Harry Potter filmset?

    • taladar@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Especially today or are they going to provide uniform phones, social media pictures,… too?

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    But uniforms have made a return to one town as part of a government pilot scheme to establish if they can reduce inequality – and improve behaviour.

    In the Brittany village of Plouisy, the mayor from Emmanuel Macron’s Renaissance party signed up for the experiment but pulled out after complaints from angry parents.

    Uniforms were first introduced in secondary schools in France by Napoleon Bonaparte in 1802, who wanted to instil more military-style discipline in the education system, and were modelled on army outfits.

    They have not been compulsory in state schools in mainland France since 1968, seen as a watershed moment in French society because of the civil unrest that dominated the spring.

    In 2016 the rightwing presidential candidate François Fillon and the far-right leader Marine Le Pen included the imposition of school uniforms in their election manifesto.

    Parents are divided about the utility of introducing uniforms: some have suggested it will lead to more apparent equality while others have pointed out that inequalities can be still expressed in such items as shoes, scarves, mobile phones and backpacks.


    The original article contains 636 words, the summary contains 179 words. Saved 72%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    So basically theyre doing the “europeans arent racist” thing. A few steps more and you can justify imperalism and then ethnic cleansing. Of course this is an exaggeration but you get the point.

      • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Most countries do it to create discipline(still think its a flawed method). Using it as a tool to create equality is strange because it makes people equal by making them the same. If you erase everyone whos not like you technically that creates equality.