• njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Food, shelter, creature comfort, the last little bit of a civilization that exists, Etc…

    Historically speaking that’s been enough for a lot of people. A lot of those authoritarian dictators throughout history stayed on a long time. Sure they could have been killed, but that inertia takes over.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Maybe, maybe not. Which has been my point the whole time you’ll notice. The inertia. People of historically put up with the crazy ass dictator the whole time. Why? Same reason we I’ll put up with nonsense in our daily lives, it’s easier. People like stability. Your scenario is just one possibility, but it’s by no means a guaranteed possibility.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I really don’t think very many, if any, people Elon would pay for post-apocalyptic bunker security would be sycophants. Paid security usually isn’t. And the type of people who love Elon would not make for good security.

        • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Most authoritarian regimes generate revenue that can be distributed among the people who keep the regime going. If you kill the dictator, you would have to take over the operations to keep the money flowing. However, if there’s a total breakdown of society, then the dictator has a big treasury, but no income. So the guards have a choice between either getting a small cut of the treasury each month, or killing the dictator/billionaire, and taking all of the treasury for themselves.