X isn’t a source. This is.

  • TruthAintEasy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    I get it, the part that is weird to me is americans having so much one-way courage that they needed to pull their guns on a man who is… on fire! Do they think bullets can kill fire? Do they not know how hard it is to threaten anyone when your ON FIRE?

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      People willing to die for a cause have been known to strap bombs to themselves and take a lot of people with them.

      Yeah bullets won’t put out the fire, but can stop someone who wants to die for a cause from getting near to other people. The only thing that can be known is the person is willing to die for a cause. What is unknown is the amount of explosives on their person. You would feel really stupid if that person started running towards you (or other people) and you left your gun in your holster.

    • Philo@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      71
      ·
      10 months ago

      Reading is fundamental. Where did it say that he was shot? I’m not defending the cop but you’d probably be confused also since it isn’t every day you run into a guy in an embassy driveway on fire. Ever heard of a human trait called compassion?

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        59
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Did you even read the article you posted? This line stood out so much that I copied it before even reading the comments:

        Law enforcement also drew a gun on the burning man during the incident.

        The person you’re replying to never said they shot him.

      • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not saying this is their reasoning, but if someone is on fire and running at you, a gun could kill them before they set you on fire. Also not saying this is their reasoning, but shooting someone who is suffering a fate they cannot undo could be considered merciful. So, shooting someone on fire could actually be effective.

      • TruthAintEasy@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I never said they shot at him, just drew on him per the article

        I’ll admit I did not consider a mercy killing

        Reading is fundamental as you said