Yep… I also say you’re pissing away your vote. And you were so busy arguing semantics that you didn’t even notice that I made you prove that you’re betting our democracy on a 1 in 50,000 chance.
Thanks for playing. And remember:
If it was this easy for me to dupe you into admitting you’re throwing away your vote, imagine how easy it was for you to buy into the bullshit that led you to believe that voting for them was worthwhile to begin with.
Plug your nose with the rest of us and help buy everyone another 4 years to come up with something better.
none of this has any bearing on whether so-called third party candidates have a remote chance.
Oh, but it does.
https://www.covers.com/politics/us-election-betting-odds
looks to me like they have a remote chance. like 1 to 50,000
ROFL! Thanks for proving my point!
i thought you said they don’t have a remote chance.
Yep… I also say you’re pissing away your vote. And you were so busy arguing semantics that you didn’t even notice that I made you prove that you’re betting our democracy on a 1 in 50,000 chance.
Thanks for playing. And remember:
If it was this easy for me to dupe you into admitting you’re throwing away your vote, imagine how easy it was for you to buy into the bullshit that led you to believe that voting for them was worthwhile to begin with.
Plug your nose with the rest of us and help buy everyone another 4 years to come up with something better.
Or piss away your vote.
i wasn’t duped at all. you said they didn’t have a remote chance (or implied it by way of a rhetorical question), and i disproved that.
Keep telling yourself that.
anyone can see exactly what happened here.
no, i’m going to use it.
… knowing it will do nothing.
it will be counted just like every other vote.