• Pratai@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Yep… I also say you’re pissing away your vote. And you were so busy arguing semantics that you didn’t even notice that I made you prove that you’re betting our democracy on a 1 in 50,000 chance.

      Thanks for playing. And remember:

      If it was this easy for me to dupe you into admitting you’re throwing away your vote, imagine how easy it was for you to buy into the bullshit that led you to believe that voting for them was worthwhile to begin with.

      Plug your nose with the rest of us and help buy everyone another 4 years to come up with something better.

      Or piss away your vote.

      • anticolonialist@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        If it was this easy for me to dupe you

        i wasn’t duped at all. you said they didn’t have a remote chance (or implied it by way of a rhetorical question), and i disproved that.

            • Pratai@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              That you got confused by a petty need to argue semantics and missed the bigger point I was making? A point that you helped me prove?

              Yep. I’m pretty sure evening will see that.

              • anticolonialist@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                you’re characterization of my response as petty or semantic is really a “you” problem. i said what i wanted to say, and i was right the whole time.