• rsuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s like everyone’s opinion is “my tribe is always right and deserves all the sympathy, the other tribe is always wrong and deserves all the suffering”. No one cares about solutions or examining why a conflict has persisted for 80 years. Humans are so predictable.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not even “my tribe”.

      Hardly anyone posting here is Israeli or Palestinian. It’s just distracting nonsense to divide us. Pick a side plebs. Look, those people have picked the other side. Hate them!

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wish two groups of people determined to kill each other could take it away from the civilian population, to say nothing of using human shields and attacking irrespective of potential collateral damage and non combatant deaths

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        More like two groups of people determined to kill civilian populations. Keeping it away from civilians would defeat the whole purpose.

    • satans_crackpipe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s older than 80 years. I recall reading about old men spitting at each other over rights to fuck the prettiest goat in Mesopotamia way before Churchill took a shit.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Humans are manipulable, especially in large numbers. Humans are violent, but not irrational. It takes convincing for that.

        • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Individually, humans are erratic, not irrational. Seeing action without reason is very rare, the thing is that the reason that lead them is often flawed. Group dynamics are a whole different beast tho, they could be described as irrational.

      • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Friendly reminder that a defining characteristic of a fascist is drawing hard in-group out-group lines.

        (And another is the fetishization and glorification of violence against the out-group)

        • JohnDoe@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wait, I’m even more confused. Are you saying the OP who posted is creating the demarcations for groups?

            • JohnDoe@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Wish there was common nomenclature for referring to posters or parts of a comment to make the context clearer. Friends say I am on the spectrum but the Psychologist said that doesn’t seem to be the case.

              Like, OP1 is lame, OP2 supports genocide, etc. to clarify within a thread without having to quote or @ which I find a bit clumsy and generally gets in the way of flow.

              • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                This sounds like a great idea!

                I’ll clarify, I’m just putting out a reminder that being fascist is not an inherent trait, like green eyes or dark skin. Literally anyone can fall into the trap of fascist thinking. The only way to be truly anti-fascist is to recognize the warning signs in your own thoughts and worldview.

                So centrism can sometimes be a trap, but don’t demonize the practice of seeing both sides. Taking a hard line with one sides is a step on the path to becoming a fascist.

                  • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    For sure I think Nazis and Tankies are both gross, and I have a kind of out-group bias against them, but I never advocate for violence against them.

                    Except maybe punching Nazis, but nothing serious damaging or life threatening.

                • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So centrism can sometimes be a trap, but don’t demonize the practice of seeing both sides.

                  Wise words.

                  It’s how Peace is achieved.

                  Taking a hard line with one sides is a step on the path to becoming a fascist.

                  And War, and death.

              • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Wish there was common nomenclature for referring to posters or parts of a comment to make the context clearer.

                For comments, that’s how I do it.

                Throw one, too, or three asterisks around each side of the sentence you want to highlight.

                No need for special verbage or nomenclature. It’s done visually.

                • JohnDoe@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah I think what I dislike about that is it breaks up the flow of whatever I am writing. There’s a coherence that is lost.

                  I’m accustomed to reading books or essays where there might be an excerpt, but more likely a paraphrase of what the author considers their opponent’s argument to be. This makes it helpful at times to pinpoint a misunderstanding in the author.

                  But yeah, having consistent rules on the internet for posting is a losing battle I think. More or less thinking out loud, appreciate the comment.

                  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yeah I think what I dislike about that is it breaks up the flow of whatever I am writing.

                    No, It doesn’t have to.

                    You can just write it out straight, without formatting, and then after you’re done that go back and add the asterisks to emphasize the parts that you want to emphasize, already having your thoughts jotted down.

              • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Ah yes, the “I have a black friend” defense.

                I have Jewish friends, so I trust you won’t call me antisemitic for saying Israel is structurally racist and authoritarian.

                  • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Why would a Jew choose to live in the West Bank when there’s a much more pleasant country next door offering them citizenship? Your analogy is so flawed I have a hard time thinking you’re making it in good faith.

                  • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Wasn’t Hitlers physician at one point a Jewish person? I don’t think one example is really all that telling.

                • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If you have a Jewish friends then you really aren’t anti semitic are you?

                  Such a smooth brain comment.

                  Not to mention a huge amount of Israelis themselves criticise the current government and what it’s done.

        • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Would that still count if it’s “In group = civilians” " out group = organizations killing civilians"?