From what I can gather this conflict as been going on a long time and the Hamas group has existed for a while too. Why are all the news cycles suddenly focusing on this the past few weeks?

  • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I posted this question too and got called a racist. I was just curious where all the Ukraine stuff went. Sounds like a planned distraction to me. And since Hamas announced it loves Russia…

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s an easy story, there are clear sides, and there are vocal demographics in the West that really care about it.

    So it drives clicks. Local Palestinian, Jewish, and related groups are saying stuff that makes for easy interviews. The “other side” is easy to find, so creating multi-source stories is a breeze. For journalists with tight daily deadlines, it’s a gift.

    Even better, politicians are courting those groups, so they’re saying stuff that, again, is easy to report on. And it’s local news!

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The right side, and the wrong side,. Plus you can interview people who argue about right versus wrong. It’s a lot of content that can be farmed

        • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          In your opinion, Which sides are which sides? I don’t need an essay, just a definition :)

            • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Which was the point I was getting to with the original commenter. But thanks for… ya know… jumping in.

              • otp@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Having “clear sides” doesn’t mean there’s a clear “right side” and “wrong side”, imo.

                • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The sides aren’t very clear when you start looking closer. And they’re both the wrong side of you think about it. The best side is the “wow that’s a shit show I’m glad I’m not involved with” side.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Something like 10,000 civilians dead in the period of a month. Tends to draw the attention

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      OP has a point. There are other conflicts that have high body counts that don’t drive front page stories. Yemen. The stuff going on in Myanmar. Uyghurs. Even the migrant crisis in the Mediterranean.

      You’re right that this is a significant conflict, but our news industry doesn’t assign column inches to body count.

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m going to go out on a limb here and suggest that the thousands of violent deaths may have something to do with it.

    • redballooon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Have you heard about Yemen recently?

      No? Then it must be quiet there. No deaths at all.