Doesn’t sound appetizing enough.
Doesn’t sound appetizing enough.
It’s frustrating how many of these systems rely on hard coded word or even substring matching, and that in a world of large language models that can evaluate semantics.
Or maybe it was the fuck
Thinking itself is not easy for many, and that doesn’t even include the critical .
Do they have a foreigner ms armee? They should enlist him immediately.
If you’re in your 20s
I think that’s two different things. Billionaires can and do get continuously richer also when there are napkins in a restaurant to satisfy customers.
Actually, satisfied customers are return customers, which every businessman knows are the best customers. Amazon certainly knows that. The reason why Amazon is so succesful is because they focus intensely on customer satisfaction. They’re fucking their employers, yes, but they wouldn’t need to. They just do because the regulations allow for it.
Guess you’re one of today’s lucky 10000
According to your statement there must be someone getting fucked. An trade where all parties are satisfied does not seem possible.
Disruptive technology doesn’t follow cost covering logic though. Covering costs is hardly interesting for investors. Netflix ran at loss to grow quickly and cement the market share.
Recent enshittification occurs because the market came to an understanding that the fight for the market share is over and now it’s time to satisfy investors.
But several things can be true at the same thing time. Infrastructure is expensive and investors want to maximize return of investment.
People always underestimate the work power needed to keep automated things running. And even more to set them up in the first place.
Many things that look like fully automated still have people in the loop.
Confused. So that’s a thing where you agree?
Or do you think that’s my position?
Or do you just post something to shut down calling outs of propaganda narratives?
deleted by creator
As I said in the other comment, not falling for one sides propaganda doesn’t automatically mean the other side is right. What we have on social media is propaganda for a supposed Palestinian side, but overwhelmingly it’s Hamas’ talking points, which are clearly anti Israel, but lacking in the “pro Palestinian” cause.
Oh dear.
Distancing yourself from one propaganda side is all well and fine, but that doesn’t mean the other side is automatically in the right, you know?
And you are using the other side’s words and narratives, which frankly is their propaganda.
Pretty sure you could answer that yourself if you wanted to.
To focus so overly much on Israels propaganda in today’s social media landscape is propaganda itself.
Pretty much on all channels there’s a between 10:1 and 20:1 relationship between pro Palestinian vs pro Israel comments.
Source: https://www.tagesschau.de/faktenfinder/israel-hamas-social-media-100.html
Oh yes. With that sort of thing better double check each time.
If it spits out the wrong syntax my compiler will tell me immediately.
That’s the spirit.