partyparrot@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 9 months agosinner(ule)lemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1404arrow-down10
arrow-up1404arrow-down1imagesinner(ule)lemmy.blahaj.zonepartyparrot@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 9 months agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-squarelars@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up54·9 months agoThe founder of the church had no problem with premarital sex. He married many women who already had living husbands.
minus-squareTheYojimbo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up25·9 months agoIt’s not premarital sex if they are already married duh. He’s married to god, they have husbands, everything checks out.
minus-squareAggravationstation@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·9 months agoOr you use the good ol’ poophole loophole
minus-squareMario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·9 months agoIn that case, I’ll take it slightly more seriously than I do the Mormon church
minus-squareMalgas@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·9 months agoIs that really premarital, though? Sounds extra post-marital to me.
The founder of the church had no problem with premarital sex. He married many women who already had living husbands.
It’s not premarital sex if they are already married duh. He’s married to god, they have husbands, everything checks out.
Or you use the good ol’ poophole loophole
BYU V club is satire fwiw
In that case, I’ll take it slightly more seriously than I do the Mormon church
Is that really premarital, though? Sounds extra post-marital to me.