Idk any more than you do.

that’s obvious

Sounds like you might be sniffing dog farts for enjoyment. I’m just suggesting the possibility though, I don’t know any more than anyone else on that topic.

What? No not at all, that makes no actual sense.

The western media having negative credibility is a good reason for China to do nothing at all. Let the west ruin itself with little effort on their part.

Why should I believe your claim that they are being funded by China? I’m sorry but I reviewed you as a source and determined you to be untrustworthy.

Please keep going, this is hilarious

Then name one source you trust and why

Then why don’t we see you in the comment sections of the posts for articles about the new york times applying the exact same methodology you’ve been applying here?

If anything everyone should take what you, a one month old account, that sprang out of nowhere, with a whole mountain of salt grains for any assertion you’ve put out.

You simply think that you cannot be persuaded to believe something that is not true; that you would see through it if that were the case.

Uno reverse, you walking projector

You’re wrong and you should learn to accept this.

Also projection. You’re so up your own ass you’ve become an small and dense enough object to tear through the fabric of space and become a blackhole of being an ignorant little shit

Protect yourself, don’t allow garbage in.

Your entire worldview is that of a self-contained circulating system of raw sewage. There’s literally zero reason to take anything you say with anything but negative credibility and seriousness.

Lmao did you vet all of these comments before reading them too? What if one of them persuaded you?! OMG YOU MIGHT ALREADY BE COMPROMISED

No I actually like being ignorent and closed minded.

A closed mind is the greatest defense

Of course I could be persuaded to believe in things that aren’t true

I used to believe the United States was a good country

“the creator of the video is able to cherry-pick their information and weave it into the narrative that they want”

Its called an essay. You take primary and secondary sources, and then weave them together with arguments to persuade a point. You also provide all your sources so people can fact check your assertions based on the facts you’ve provided. Typically you need to read/listen to the essay. Then if you find their arguments unpersuasive, or fishy you check their sources and reply (you don’t literally have to, it can be just for yourself) using their own sources against them, or your own sources and arguments that dispute their claims. Its the essence of critical thinking, genius.

So you won’t trust sources that aren’t “vetted”, and you refuse to vet them yourself: how, then, do you even establish the trust you seek?

Actually a lot of people have time for that, several of them are here telling you that you’re wrong, and you refuse to listen to any of them because your head is so far up your ass you can’t see daylight

Then watch the video and tell us how much of it is bullshit. I’m watching the video right now, it’s not difficult to do, you can do it too, you might come away fully assured of your position.