• taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    You know, this should only trick young kids as they genuinely believe taller = more. The fact that it probably tricks a ton of adults just suggests their critical thinking never made it past adolescence and we should be very concerned by that.

    • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This doesn’t really have anything to do with critical thinking, it’s just that our brains work on estimations and approximations, although experience can balance it out.

      Try this: draw a martini glass (inverted cone), and draw a line where you think it would be half full.

      It will be wrong. Numberphile - Cones are messed up (YT)

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That’s more an argument in semantics. Developmental psych actually has this as a brain development stage, with the later stages being about critical thinking even if the earlier phase doesn’t seem so. Experiments were done where children of various ages were tested on benchmarks such as volume and kids under a certain age failed almost universally (I forget the age, something like 5 or 6) in the same way that infants lack object permanence. Later, at 9 and around 13 (?) the same framework argues that the brain gets basic and advanced problem solving and critical thinking, although even that theory admits plenty of people skip that last milestone.

        Your point is more a common logical (sensory?) fallacy that plenty of adults fall into, but isn’t necessarily the same thing. At least, I think it is, I’m a bit busy right now to check and it’s bad enough I’m typing this out instead of taking care of my own toddler, lol.

      • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Essentially all of America’s problems are because its population is so uneducated. We want simple answers to complicated questions because that’s the best we can hope to understand. 52% of us can barely read at a 6th grade level FFS. The ignorance then allows us to entertain some pretty dark thoughts leading us to Trump.

        • Jhex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Hmmmm while I agree a large uneducated population is a terrible problem, I would not say this is the cause. I would characterize it as a “condition” necessary to get this low.

          I find just saying all problems are because of lack of education feels like an indirect way of saying “If I take advantage of you, it’s only because you let me” which I believe leaves the evil-doers off the hook

          Kind of like saying “the problem with school shootings is because kids are so soft and squishy, they are easily destroyed by bullets” (obviously I am exaggerating here to make my point clearer)

      • IngeniousRocks (They/She) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Of course we are, our education system is designed to churn out undereducated, incapable of critical thought, silent, obedient cogs for the corporate machine.

        Edit: made a typo

        • taiyang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I want to point out that, especially after No Child Left Behind, we’ve actively worked to teach-to-the-test in public schools. That was a bipartisan compromise to make education “accountable” that ultimately worsened education. Obama’s DoE helped, slightly, in 2015 adjustments but it’s still no where near where it should be and made only worse by a push to get more charters and affordable private schools that don’t understand pedagogy.

          That is to say, uneducated isn’t quite right as It’s not a lack of education, but more of a misguided pedagogy that prioritizes rote memorization over deductive reasoning and critical thinking. It’s not a lack of trying, but an avoidence of evidence based approaches.

    • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 hours ago

      How much critical thinking is going on in a supermarket? Anyway, the tall ones also warm faster 😡

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Oh good point, another downside of the taller shape. More surface area = warms faster and uses more aluminum.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Critical thinking (or at least reasoning) is everywhere, even when people drive or do chores, an ounce of thoughtfulness at the very least makes a difference.

        And yes, warm soda. Lol

    • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It surprises me none at all that a significant market share of an American brand are stupid enough to fall for it.

    • PNWKid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Makes me remember a study where conservatives fall for internet scams at like a 3x higher rate than everyone else lol

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The fact they kept the lid the same size probably helps the deception, especially once there’s no old cans to compare it to. This could actually work out to be a good thing if people buy fewer sugary sodas while thinking they’re drinking about the same