cultural reviewer and dabbler in stylistic premonitions
python -c 'print((61966753*385408813*916167677<<2).to_bytes(11).decode())'
$ python
>>> b"Hello World".hex()
'48656c6c6f20576f726c64'
>>> 0x48656c6c6f20576f726c64
87521618088882533792115812
$ factor 87521618088882533792115812
87521618088882533792115812: 2 2 61966753 385408813 916167677
If you’re ready to break free of Android, I would recommend https://postmarketos.org/ though it only works well on a small (but growing!) number of devices.
imho if you want to (or must) run Android and have (or don’t mind getting) a Pixel, Graphene is an OK choice, but CalyxOS is good too and runs on a few more devices.
i guess maybe if you’re using a device with a tiny screen and a lemmy client that doesn’t let you zoom in on images
Hi, I’m an admin on lemmy.ml. The account of the one existing mod of the session community here has apparently been deleted.
I’ve heard there are some bugs with moderation of remote communities, but, I just made you a mod there anyway. I don’t know the state of those bugs; it might work better if you made an account on this instance.
Btw, I recommend against using Session for a variety of reasons including the one I posted in your thread here.
It’s literally a covert project funded by google to both sell pixels and harvest data of “privooocy” minded users. It seems to be working well.
Is it actually funded by Google? Citation needed.
I would assume Graphene users make up a statistically insignificant number of Pixel buyers, and most of the users of it I’ve met opt to use it without any Google services.
17 × 59 = 10003
you’ve got an extra zero in there, and you forgot the 1, but the rest of your divisors match my crude brute-force approach:
>>> n=31521281
>>> d = [ x for x in range(1,n//2+1) if not n%x ]
>>> d
[1, 11, 17, 59, 187, 649, 1003, 2857, 11033, 31427, 48569, 168563, 534259, 1854193, 2865571]
>>> yours=list(map(int,"11+17+59+2857+11033+534259+1854193+2865571+168563+48569+10003+31427+649+187".split("+")))
>>> set(yours) - set(d)
{10003}
>>> set(d) - set(yours)
{1, 1003}
>>> sum(d)
5518399
same conclusion though: 5518399 also ≠ 31521281
>>> isperfect = lambda n: n == sum(x for x in range(1,n//2+1) if not n%x)
>>> [n for n in range(1, 10000) if isperfect(n)]
[6, 28, 496, 8128]
(from https://oeis.org/A000396 i see the next perfect number after 8128 is 33550336 which is too big for me to wait for the naive approach above to test…)
>>> divisors_if_perfect = lambda n: n == sum(d:=[x for x in range(1,n//2+1) if not n%x]) and d
>>> print("\n".join(f"{n:>5} == sum{tuple(d)}" for n in range(10000) if (d:=divisors_if_perfect(n))))
6 == sum(1, 2, 3)
28 == sum(1, 2, 4, 7, 14)
496 == sum(1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 31, 62, 124, 248)
8128 == sum(1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 127, 254, 508, 1016, 2032, 4064)
shoutout to the person who reported this post with “Reason: Bot meme, you can’t even read it. whoever replies is a bot too” 😂
it’s the same joke as “caesar salad was invented by julius caesar”
Except it’s a bit different because the Caesar in Caesar salad (named after chef Caesar Cardini) is actually spelled the same way as Julius Caesar, whereas Neapolitan (meaning of Naples) is not related to the name Napoleon at all.
It hadn’t occurred to me that Neapolitan ice cream might have something to do with the name Napoleon before I saw this meme; the similarity of the words and incorrect implication that they are related is what makes it funny.
I think OP has no idea that it’s called Neapolitan ice cream
(i think you’re mistaken, and also that OP’s meme is good)
Neapolitan ice cream is not named after Napoleon
voting using many accounts.
i see the one for 64 made it past 400 upvotes, so i predict this will eventually make it to 512 but i am skeptical that the next one will be able to reach 1024 without vote stuffing (and please don’t do that)
lol, i just accepted the title tag from the page which the create post form auto-filled 🤡