• esc27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Scenario I’ve been playing with:

    Suppose you are kidnapped by two people. They tell you that one of them will shoot you and then let you go, but you get to decide who shoots. Person A says he will shoot you in the head. Person B says he will shoot you in the shoulder. Which do you choose?

    The more think about this the more I like it. Both persons are clearly awful and contributed to the situation. Both could offer better choices but refuse. Both are rather similar in outcomes. But one is clearly worse.

    Is it rational to choose to be shot at all? Is it rational to not choose the better of two alternatives?

    • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      58 minutes ago

      This is a false dichotomy though. I’d argue the fact that “escape” doesn’t even cross your mind in this hypothetical scenario is damning.

    • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Bank robber. Get away driver.

      Would be a good analogy.

      Yes, the bank robber shot and killed the clerk.

      But they are both bank robbers

      Who is more evil? The one that does the act or the one that enables it?

    • m532@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Libs can’t win in reality so they make shit up

      In your hypothetical made up story, kill them both

    • PineRune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Then the people who claim to love you choose for you and say that getting shot in the head would be better for you. Any attempt to convince them otherwise is met with absolute disbelief.