• taladar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Considering your average printer is a piece of shit that needs to be replaced quite often, yes, using a website is probably more energy efficient.

    • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Generally companies use service contracts to keep those things working so mo they wouldn’t be replaced often. They are just a piece of shit

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      23 hours ago

      That and those servers are going to be running anyway. Powering a simple restaurant website is a grain of sand on the beach of internet usage.

      • enkers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Yeah, exactly. If you’re worried about the power draw to host a few hundred KB PDF file, you probably shouldn’t be using Lemmy, because scrolling through your feed probably uses 100x that in energy costs.

        You have to remember that the shared hosting or aws, or wherever is going to be cheapest to host a simple website is also going to be very power efficient. Wasting power is just throwing away free money, and if there’s one thing corporations don’t do, it’s throw away free money.

    • minibyte@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Most companies will be using laser printers, some of which may outlive me. Toner is cheap and lasts an age.

      Inkjet printers are cheap for a reason. They’re a scam.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        In fairness neither have I - though I suspect it’s not as insignificant as others have claimed.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          It’s not insignificant at all. Servers are beefy and take more power than a standard PC… a lot more. Further, failover servers mean you have to have exact copies of the same server up and available, which means you’re doubling, tripling, quadrupling power demands. Finally, you also have to have Uninterruptible Power Supplies, those take an amount of power as well.

          It’s a huge power draw. I know because I have a bunch of low-power devices runnig 24/7 as microservices and it still increase my power bill and use by a lot. I regularly get letters from the power company about how I’m using like 3x the power of the average person in my type of unit.

          • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago
            1. You can host a webserver on a Raspberry Pi. I don’t know what you’re doing with your setup but you absolutely do not need hundreds of watts to serve a few hundred KB worth of static webpage or PDF file. This website is powered by a 30 watt solar panel attached to a car battery on some guy’s apartment balcony. As of writing its at 71% charge.

            2. An Ampere Altra Max CPU has 128 ARM cores (the same architecture that a raspberry pi uses), with a 250 watt max TDP. That works out to about 2 watts per core. Each of those cores is more than enough to serve a little static webpage on its own, but in reality since a lot of these sites get less than 200 hits per day the power cost can be amortized over thousands of them, and the individual cores can go to sleep if there’s still not enough work to do. Go ahead and multiply that number by 4 for failover if you want, its still not a lot. (Not that the restaurant knows or cares about any of this, all this would be decided by a team of people at a massive IT company that the restaurant bought webpage hosting from).

          • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            22 hours ago

            I regularly get letters from the power company about how I’m using like 3x the power of the average person in my type of unit.

            I’m also using a lot of self hosted things but have never received any of those.

            Where do you reside generally where they’re sending them because it ain’t a thing here in the UK?

            • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              22 hours ago

              US, west coast.

              It’s not meant to make a person feel attacked as much as gently nudging them to use less power.

              Pretty sure its even automated.

              • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.id
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                22 hours ago

                I don’t think I’d feel “attacked” but more impressed that I came to light if they sent me them very much like a naughty “copyright warning” and would send it back with a brick in it.

                Cheers!

          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            22 hours ago

            I had not considered that an uninterruptible power supply would be consuming power after charging. I suppose no electronics are 100% efficient at what they do.

            I’ve been playing with a Proxmox server on an ITX system for local services and rare game hosting for friends. I’d love something low power I could have on all the time.