• Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    There are good parts and bad parts to it. Historically, it was used for good in the form of letting slaves go free. It was also historically used to let lynch mobs go free, which is horrifying.

    It’s not 100% good, nor is it 100% bad.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s just another part of democracy. “Democracy is the worst form of government, except all the others that have been tried.”

      Any form of government can produce positive and negative outcomes. Even absolute monarchy had its moments. Once in a very blue moon, you would actually get a “good” king or tyrant, one that really did try to use his power and influence for the greater good. But through trial and error we learned that, on average, democratic systems produce far better outcomes than monarchical or dictatorial ones. No system of government has entirely positive outcomes; they just vary in their ratio of positive to negative.

      • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Agreed, 100%. Democratic juries are absolutely better.

        I was mostly addressing this part:

        complaining about jury nullification just means you don’t like the good parts of having a jury.

        There are some valid cases to complain about it. But the majority of the time, it’s a good thing.