TP-link is reportedly being investigated over national security concerns linked to vulnerabilities in its very popular routers.

  • Gerudo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 minutes ago

    So who tf is left who makes good wireless routers? When I bought my tp-link it was top rated and recommended by everyone.

  • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    Damn, maybe we should have some kind of privacy law that could have prevented this behavior from ever being allowed in the first place.

  • remer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The US government is just upset because it’s harder to place back doors in non-US hardware. It’s a US national security concern to NOT have US back doors in devices.

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      That’s not all. The US government exists to look out for the interests of wealthy americans.

      Every dollar spent on a different nation is a dollar that could’ve been spent on them, in their eyes.

      American business owners know that China is competitive because they can provide better products at cheaper prices. Americans would need to invest in making their products better or lower prices to compete with China. Both result in lower profits for owners.

      This is why we will never stop seeing FUD against products that offer us a better deal than those looking to exploit us further. It’s more profitable to convince useful idiots to “buy american” than it is to actually sell them products worth buying at competitive prices.

      • atthecoast@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        This comment is suspicious to me. It’s been companies like Apple that have pioneered using Chinese labor to increase their profits. Moving jobs to the USA won’t help make them any richer. It makes economic sense but not strategic sense

  • Amoxtli@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Joe Biden has turned out to be the most fascist president in recent memory. He even supports fascism abroad. When a president supports a country that blocks a certain denomination of religion, bans a whole language, and bans political parties, using Nazee propaganda as a recruitment marketing, while having no democracy. What can you say? Then he supports ethnic cleansing to make Lebensraum for another ethnic group. What a sick man this chap is and completely incompetent. Now he is banning things made by Chinese people, if that isn’t racist, I don’t know what is. The only thing he is exceptional at is getting others killed. Good riddance. One thing for sure, there will be no justice.

    • Myro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 hour ago

      What the hell are you taking about? Get out of your bubble.

  • ben@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’d personally hope they just force open sourcing their firmwares if they want to stay in the market. I really like my Omada stuff, ubiquiti is just a tough pill to swallow on price.

    • tty5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They (FCC) forced firmwares being signed so nobody can install their own on the off chance it unlocks TX power or frequencies not allowed by FCC.

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Can’t say I’ve ever seen an example of signed firmware that didn’t exist to further exploit the working class.

      • pirat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I recently bought their Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) based on multiple recommendations online when looking for a router that supports OpenWRT. That’s preinstalled, with AdGuard Home and WireGuard VPN on top of it. I’m looking forward to set it up and play around with it.

        What do you exactly mean when you describe their approach in software as Android-like? That it’s easy to install services in OpenWRT?

  • NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    We have this really great approach to security where we allow the adversary to infiltrate a huge portion of our infrastructure for years and at many different levels, and then we say “hm, maybe we shouldn’t be allowing this?”

    • BMTea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Almost like it has less to do with security and more to do with securitization of economic competition.

      • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        If you really think this is just about economic competition, you’re very wrong.

        The FBI didn’t recommend using encrypted messaging apps because our infrastructure being compromised is no biggie.

        These are computers manufactured by and in a foreign country that’s expressed mutual hostility to the US. Computers follow instructions and manufacturers are in the best positioning to add custom instructions like “if you receive this instruction, brick yourself.”

        After the cyber attacks in the last decade people should realize crypto scammers aren’t the only one’s that have an interest in shutting down important infrastructure.

        • eskimofry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          This comment of yours immediately evokes the idea of the right hand that doesn’t know what the left hand is doing.

          The right hand is the security theatre that the west is showing its citizens against foreign adversaries who hack their devices and introduce vulnerabilities.

          Meanwhile the left hand has been doing mass layoffs and moving manufacturing off-shore ever since the 60s and 70s and trying to fuck over it’s own labour forces to make exponential profits.

          Whats funny here is that you guys are bitching about “foreign adversaries” while also handing over the blueprints of your entire infrastructure to said adversaries without giving them anything valuable in return for their cheap labour cost and weak laws.

          What did you expect to happen?

          • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            The right hand doesn’t know what the left hand is doing; that’s just it you’re right.

            There’s no conspiracy where the left and right hand have carefully coordinated this system or conspiracy to protect companies from their legitimate competition. We’re not saying this about Taiwan or European devices (even though many of them are better than the Chinese and American devices) and that’s kind of “case and point” that it’s about more than the economy.

            Basically the politicians just screwed up and didn’t think through their decisions and effects of trusting a foreign power to do all this manufacturing for important pieces of infrastructure that “think” … and now there’s a problem.

          • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Yes, this is what a capitalist, non-centrally-planned economy does. There are multiple hands and the hand of the capitalist class is often the strongest and it will do all the things you mentioned, while the gov’t hand is trying to do damage control, but only able to the point where it hurts capitalists.

    • LifeLemons@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Well its just natural for coubtries to do this at this point when they dont like each other

      In an off topic, I often prefer a open hardware router like raspberry pi router as it gives me control! For me it’s safer to use as documentation is open like pfsense and openwrt.

      • Avieshek@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I don’t understand why doesn’t Raspberry Pi make a router when they’ve ideas like the 500 🤦🏻‍♂️

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          There’s already OpenWrt for Pi. All you need is to add a switch or a USB ethernet adapter.

  • frankgrimeszz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Running OpenWRT is generally a good idea. I’m not gonna lie and say it’s easy to setup. But it’s worth it.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      It’s a good idea, but there’s going to be firmware at lower levels (roughly the BIOS) that could still be compromised. It’s best to just not buy Chinese hardware designed and manufactured by a Chinese company with no western involvement when you can avoid it.

      • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        This didn’t even occur to me when I bought my new router recently. I just went with one of the best-reviewed models that had all the features and speed I needed.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Out of curiosity, what would happen with older models. Also other devices, like I don’t have a TPlink router but I do have a TPlink Ethernet to power to Ethernet I bought when I lived in an appartment and didn’t want to drill holes in the walls. (Wifi ran from center of house, but outed it to a 110 in the wall and hardwired to a PC into a RAP for work in bedroom at the time.

            • paraphrand@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              21 seconds ago

              Older devices stop getting software/firmware updates.

              But usually simpler things like USB to Ethernet adapters and switches don’t have much going on update wise. If anything at all. Switches often do, adapters rarely do.

              The best you can do is keep an eye on updates for the devices, if any. Keep an ear out for reported vulnerabilities, and then retire devices when they are no longer maintained.

              But all of that is quite a burden for a device most people set up and forget about. At some scale, and in some senses, there is no good answer. New vulnerabilities are found all the time in hardware/software.

              If you just mean “will old devices stop working”? No. This would just impact new sales.

      • frankgrimeszz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I’m not sure, but with routers, I think OpenWRT installs/flashes at the firmware level. There could be hardware level vulnerabilities I suppose.

        In the case of Lenovo laptops used in Iraq (2004), China had additional hardware chips snooping and sending data back via Ethernet cable.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        An even better way is to leave vulnerable pieces in all parts of the firmware / software stack. E.g. old version of SSH with a known vulnerability or two, old web server, etc. Then just exploit as needed.

        • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The examples you gave are all at the OS level and installing OpenWRT would fix them. The firmware/BIOS level is much more custom and can be susceptible to attacks the OS is completely unaware of (effectively pre-installed rootkits). Hence why I mentioned it may not be enough to install OpenWRT.

          • richmondez@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            You are talking about the boot loader, but even that is pretty standard. There could be hardware exploits in place, sure, but we are mostly talking about a very low margin product and the volume of data that you’d need to retrieve and process to sift out anything useful would be massive and obvious so in general I think this is mostly conspiracy level thinking. Any shenanigans is going to be done in small targeted batches if it’s done at all to try to infiltrate specific targets and reduce risk of some curious researcher or enthusiast accidentally stumbling across it and ruining it.

            • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              but we are mostly talking about a very low margin product and the volume of data that you’d need to retrieve and process to sift out anything useful would be massive and obvious so in general I think this is mostly conspiracy level thinking

              Bold of you to assume they actually need to make money on these.

              They also don’t need to sort through data to be problematic; they just need to be able to be remotely disabled or remotely given the order to start sniffing if they are one of the higher end systems that would be used in major infrastructure (that could process at volume).

              Sure a researcher could stumble upon something… But closed source, embedded deep in the hardware, etc the number of researchers working at that level is not all that high AFAIK. The research is also from my understanding very very difficult at that level. It would be borderline equivalent to reverse engineering the Intel remote management engine or something.

          • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Yes of course, you’re right. The point I’m making is that wherever you’re putting in backdoors, instead of backdoors, you can just leave unlatched vulnerabilities. Gives you solid plausible deniability.

  • Erasmus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Someone in the comment section posted a good question. Which specific routers that TP-Link makes are the issue?

    Is it all routers that they make or is this just because they are selling inexpensive routers that have become a large part of the US market?

    Does someone have an article that isn’t biased one way or the other that gives a list of effected routers ?

    • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      47 minutes ago

      They don’t care. They want to ban TP-Link as a company, routers are just an excuse.

      This is the same people that keep blocking US gdpr legislation, so we know for a fact they don’t care about us, they just care about not being able to spy themselves.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Which specific routers that TP-Link makes are the issue?

      They are presumably talking about CovertNetwork-1658 and the reason there’s no list of routers is because no one has publicly described the vulnerability that is being leveraged.

      My guess is that the vulnerability is present on most of their routers. I’m basing that opinion on the fact that previous CVEs issues against TP-LINK have impacted their most popular product lines like Archer and Deco.

      It’s possible that this is related to CVE-2024-21833 which was open in January of 2024, update in July of 2024, then updated again in late November of 2024.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Does someone have an article that isn’t biased one way or the other

      We’re literally inside an imperial core.

      that gives a list of effected routers ?

      If there was a list of effected routers, TP-Link would most likely have patched them.

      • Avieshek@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Most likely old routers still sold on Amazon instead of the latest WiFi 7 models on the website~

    • KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Apple has been slowly shifting production to India for years now, and the software is made domestically.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        More importantly, the hardware is designed and inspected by Apple’s engineers. Security vulnerabilities would be Apple’s failure regardless of the origin of the parts.

  • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I feel sorry for D-Link, they’re probably going to get caught in the crossfire via people thinking they’re the same company.

  • Luci@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So many MSPs are gonna panic if tplink is banned