• 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Married het cis male. Wife is absolutely bent out of shape due to our states bull shit abortion ban and with Trump being in office again. We had been talking about a second kiddo… But she told me that she wanted me to get a vasectomy Monday morning at 8am. She’s not leaving her life in the hands of old dudes.

    So… I’m going to schedule it for inauguration day .

    Other than that… okay. Tho… I did buy another carry gun. ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

    Edit: voted Dem all the way down ballot.

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        3 days ago

        Contrarian take: being so ostentatious in the “proper” use of such terms is one reason that Democrats just lost and that the rest of us outside America will now have to suck up yet more of Trump.

          • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            It is impenetrable jargon. Inadvertently or otherwise, it is being used by the enlightened few as a stick with which to beat the (supposed) ignorant bigoted masses. A lot of people find this deeply annoying and objectionable. Addendum: To be clear, that includes me and I am not “cis het”.

            • [email protected]@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              So long as it isn’t attempting to refurbish words that are still in common use and already have common meanings, I usually have no issue with new-speak. Unnecessary abbreviations are taxing, though cis and het have become ubiquitous enough that I can almost forgive it.

              • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Agreed. Much better to introduce new jargon than to insidiously repurpose existing language. This is the point Orwell made.

                But it’s jargon nonetheless. It’s exclusionary by definition.

                • [email protected]@sh.itjust.worksOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  I dunno. Online, it feels less like jargon and more like an attempt at avoiding any snark. Irl, I occasionally hear “cis” but most people say “straight” or rather than “het.” Just another synonym to memorize for me

                  • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    You seem like a likeable person who’s trying to the do the right thing.

                    Personally, I would prefer a world where people did not feel obliged by social pressure to announce such details about the minutiae of their private lives. I would prefer that individuals saw themselves first and foremost as individuals and not as representatives of this or that group of (supposed) oppressor or (supposed) victim. This whole situation looks to me transparently like the result of overreach by an advocacy class that needed to find a problem that it could solve. IMO most people are not, and never have been, bigots. They’re usually nice folks trying to do the right thing, like you. And it feels to me like they are being manipulated.

      • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Go far enough left… You get your guns back.

        Liberal gun owners sub on reddit used to be decent.

      • ChillPenguin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Literally just bought a gun safe. Plan on getting a shotgun in the next month for black Friday. Gotta protect yourself.

      • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’ve been eyeing a DP12. Probably complete overkill but at the same time, if someone comes knocking down my door then I want to be able to erase them with extreme prejudice if I have to.

          • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Aside from being a bullpup and the clumsiness of trying to load two independent tube mags, what’s wrong with it? I’m not expecting to storm a fortified position; I’m only expecting to use it for self-defense and I highly doubt I’d need to go through both mags in such a situation (if so then I’d probably be fucked either way) so reloading shouldn’t be a problem. Bullpup is bullpup *shrug*. The other option is some form of semi-auto shotgun like a Saiga-12 that I can buy a drum mag for.

            I’m not really interested in a rifle or pistol. Not really interested in something that can penetrate multiple walls and potentially end up in my neighbor’s neighbor’s wall. If I end up actually getting organized with a group then that’d change, but my modus operandi right now is to put my head down until I’m in a more secure environment; which means basically a shotgun because that seems like the ideal self-defense weapon for a home environment.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      So… I’m going to schedule it for inauguration day .

      Go get it Monday if you aren’t opposed to it. No reason to wait and risk pregnancy being a couple weeks along on inauguration day.