• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Man, I really hate seeing comments like this. I feel like I need to reiterate that BitWarden is NOT an open-source company. They are committed to providing open-source compatible products with their products. Two very different things.

    If they feel their product is somehow lacking or affected by whatever they are packaging right now, they are completely free to change it. They also have no barriers to entry for users who wish to use another client.

    It’s really not a big deal.

    • vzq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      51
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Man, I really hate seeing comments like this.

      That’s not a strong way to start a comment if you want to have a conversation.

      I feel like I need to reiterate that BitWarden is NOT an open-source company. They are committed to providing open-source compatible products with their products. Two very different things.

      I don’t particularly care about your feelings, but go right ahead.

      I’m curious though, did I say or imply they were AN OPEN SOURCE COMPANY ™ (whatever the fuck that even means?)

      If they feel their product is somehow lacking or affected by whatever they are packaging right now, they are completely free to change it.

      Of course. And I’m free to post on this fucking website how I feel about it.

      Isn’t all this freedom to discuss our feelings just fucking great?

      It’s really not a big deal

      Options about this obviously differ.