

IT’S ALMOST LIKE THIS IS A CONSPIRACY COME TRUE
IT’S ALMOST LIKE THIS IS A CONSPIRACY COME TRUE
🤦
Sure, bud. Read up the chain.
At what point do imagine that DHCP is not in play here?
Y’all keep talking about randomized MAC like it’s a tool of anonymity or something. Wow.
It’s a Boolean setting on Android, and there is no reason to change this. OP doesn’t understand networking.
Because the MAC address isn’t a part of the tcp/ip exchange. You’re specifically addressing TCP/IP only.
If you’re trying to block something by MAC address, you’re doing it wrong.
70% of the country is not Trump friendly by vote. These are federal judges that can wreak havoc on the impunity of these people.
Musk has been planning this for awhile and moved his physical things to Texas, but that doesn’t apply to New York, California or Illinois. Also why they’re trying to erase the people watching elections at the federal level.
Either way, if a bank in any state doesn’t abide a federal judges order, they will cease to exist very quickly. That’s how you hit these people.
Why the name change though? Most projects put up a deprecation notice on the old one and a link to the new if they do this.
The PCB is probably shedding at this point, so the contacts have a gap. You could try putting a nub of something in there for added pressure, but it surely still won’t feel right while playing.
Is buying a used controller out of the question?
Okay then if Wireguard, you need to punch through your NAT and allow that port access to the world, then to fix your outing issue, you need to look up split-tunneling. That should solve the issues you’re seeing if I’m reading this right.
Well you’ve definitely overcomplicated things by introducing a lot of different variables into the mix. What you’ve set up is a hat on a hat. An abstraction on top of another abstraction.
Let me break it down and just ask: are you just trying to ensure your friends can only access certain addresses on your network, and you’re using Tailscale ACLs for that purpose? It sounds like you just want proper routing security at the edge of your network and are going this route to avoid having to do that maybe?
Tailscale has a place and works great for lots of things, but using it like this is going to cause all kinds of problems eventually. You’re basically just advertising a bunch of confused routes to the coordinator like this, and DERP connections will eventually fail or freak out because you’re providing multiple paths to different things if I’m reading this right. You’re also introducing A LOT of network overhead because of this, and I can forsee a lot of connectivity issues in gaming throughput if that’s the main purpose.
They are deliberately not giving the time scale on these things, and this is all from inception of these programs. This is a cumulative total of spending over decades in most cases, and definitely over many years for others.
Fuck these assholes for trying to justify their existence.
Which dipshit in his “cabinet” is feeding him these lines though? Focus on them.
Many constitutional law experts out here saying the same things, but to simplify because this article sort of drags on:
They can do this at any and all levels of government, and Trump’s clowns can’t be everywhere all at once. They could even freeze Musk’s money in the country via banks and property seizures. I guess we have to see how tough these people are, but if they fail, people need to be willing to take up that mantle somehow.
Even dumber this time. It’s as if he’s even more radicalized with idiocy this time somehow…
Yup
Separate your services if possible. NAS just needs to store files. Eggs in one basket, fault tolerance yada yada.
This, plus also it’s good to revisit your setups from time to time to audit and improve.
Why? It’s free if you don’t setup a custom runner and those cover your areas.