This seems incredibly interesting, but the idea of a ‘general purpose syncing service’, in the way he describes it, makes my head scream’security concern’. In general the way it’s described the format is not fixed for these services so your data might as well be encrypted in any arbitrary way I think?
But knowing this wouldn’t this kind of general purpose syncing service need some way of identifying what data it is even syncing? Unless you encooperate something grand like the signal protocol (as in encrypted anonymous messaging) you d always run a security risk if the service you use for syncing is not self-controlled?
If anyone has more insight on this I’d be very interested, it seems like a very good concept.
It sounds to me like anything other than p2p local syncing with some protocol is a confidentiality no-go.
As someone who sees these articles, who should I not vote for? Is there some ranking for ‘most asshole-ish politician’ regarding the EU? I know every politician has somewhat dirt on them but I’d love to know what to avoid since apparently some of those turds are worse than others.
This is what I had in mind as well; If you had to how would you add a beamer to this that could use your jellyfin/plex server?
Ideally I’d want a pi or mini pc behind the beamer that I can switch on/off remotely so that part is not always on
Okay I never knew that, I would also accept tips for setting up a star trek beamer though xD
Someone who knows this please tell me what I am misunderstanding, though this is not related particularly to this article.
What is “gender affirming care”? When i hear that I am thinking of some racist dad who is forcing their son to go to some camp to get the gay ‘affirmed/corrected’ out of him or something along those lines.
I feel like I keep misreading the different definitions of what is meant where and why.
In general the article seems to be a summary of current legislative actions that are ongoing between big tech and EU. Though in the article it’s worded with the much more fitting ‘game of chicken between EU and Big Tech’ rather than something like the title, but I guess “drop dead has a better ring to it”…
I general the article has a lightly optimistic tone, which I very deeply hope holds true.
Beg? Or am I misunderstanding this?
Aahh OK so they are the IDFs responsibility and they are being purposefully neglegent, makes sense to be trialed for that.
Assuming these are unaffiliated civilians (which I am assuming here that these people are just assholes who hate Palestinians) can they be trialed for this as a war crime?
This seems to be posted on this forum with that title solely for rage-bait.
She clearly just-for-fun redesigned Wikipedia as if a modern company got a hold of it. Yes of course this would drive people in this forum up a wall, but that’s just not the point. This is also not about programming at all?
Don’t go around looking for content of other creators just to take it out of context and then bash it.
This is like you watched “we made marvel r-rated” from corridor digital (https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=k5-3eujJyZE) and then post about it, being pissed how they destroyed a superhero fantasy aimed at a wide audience and children and how noone would ever want something like that.
Calling her a bad designer just because you disagree with her design decisions is just mean. This entire post just makes it seem like you are specifically looking for things to hate…
I really think it’s disgusting to boldly claim this is just to protect children. Then get the proposal denied with very valid reasoning that everyone’s privacy would be compromised.
And then, a few months later, they have the exact same argument again with the same proposal as before… This seems deeply disrespectful of the subject matter
It feels like a someone is trying to steal a cookie from a cookie jar, but when mum said no you just try again the exact same way…
Have you heard of e os? https://e.foundation/e-os/
De googling your android is at least a possibility, ripping apple out of ios is not possible
/u/[email protected] explains this well, though I got a different take on the analogy.
Imagine you are trying to put air into a deflating balloon that’s about to ‘loose form’ that’s essentially what you are trying.
Put just enough air (energy/mass) into the star and it will stay stable, loosing as much as you put into it.
Too little and the star will dissolved, in this example you’d fully absorb it.
Too much and you are essentially infusing a star with so much mass that it explodes all over again.
If you are trying to stabilise a star this way, ideally, it would never even begin to go nova.
After spending a day with it, this is exactly what I want! Thanks for the recommendation
thanks! I’ve tried this but in the end its just a different way of displaying but i want groups to be contained differently as well
Thanks for the tip! I actually consider what you call an advantage a disadvantage and visa versa. I always have 2 opera windows open side to side (on i3) and like that they are not the same
I would be very worried if this was ‘final, and now we will do it as written’ but it seems to be just another iteration.the critique is great and I just hope they listen.
I am not shocked, but i’d save disappointed for when they try to do it and noone uses it because of these reasons.