![](/static/253f0d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
Some servers are much worse at it than others. I’m a Chinese who got banned from .ml because I was ‘racist’ for making Xinnie jabs.
Some servers are much worse at it than others. I’m a Chinese who got banned from .ml because I was ‘racist’ for making Xinnie jabs.
Thank you for bringing some sanity to the discussion
They’re a Filipino. Not exactly an infamous source of antisemitists. And ‘88’ may mean something in the west, but here in Asia it generally means nothing more than your birth year.
Are we now accusing others of antisemitism based on nothing more than a few random letters? WTF?
Infamous implies somebody is famous in a negative way. If anything, Gabe is a shining example that should be upheld.
Why would we discuss changing the law, rather than ensuring that it is applied indiscriminately? ANY law and punishment can be used to discriminate, and many are. By your logic if the police started prosecuting murderers in a biased manner, we should remove the law against murder.
Seems like I’m being attacked for something I didn’t say. My statement was purely a very minor thing, about how the issue is enforcement, not the actual law. And I certainly did not imply anything with it, but it seems a lot is being read into those few words that were not at all intended
? The law has been around a century, current controversy is that it’s not being applied equally
What about my statement is brutal? It’s not the law at fault, the law is impartial about all religious symbols. The problem is the lack of equal enforcement. Which is essentially what you’re saying in different words
That’s a problem with enforcement, not the law.
Not sure why you’re citing US law when we’re discussing foreign govts. Also the obvious thing signal can do, that most complainants would probably expect as a minimum, is banning their accounts and closing the group.
I don’t get what you’re trying to say at all. If a party is in a group chat and reports it, they can provide their credentials to Signal to enable Signal to view the contents of the chat.
Yes, they’re a carrier that does not know the content of what they carry. But once they are made aware, the legal system considers them to now bear responsibility if they don’t take action. Whether or not that’s fair is a pretty large topic, though I’m inclined to think so myself.
Funny how the .ml admins are so opposed to free speech on their own server, then.
Yes, but we’re discussing group chats disseminating piracy links. Do you think it’s harder to join such a group chat and report it to signal than it is to do all the cloak and dagger nonsense?
In a group chat, M wouldn’t be a 3rd party.
Shame it’s only THEIR children they give a damn about
Becky sounds fun. Got her number?
On the contrary, I wish more people would do it.
How is it mobile incompatible? What browser are you on
This is one side of the story. It’s entirely possible CF did provide those details