sunzu

The term crime lost a lot of its meaning somewhere between 10 commandments and now…

I guess dude committed a crime here but most people prolly would not really care.

While others commit bigger crimes and we care, nothing gets done.

I think we are talking about two different things. I was mainly asking for legal reason for the judge’s injunction, looks like it is not a ruling but a stall tho.

She will rule later. That’s what I was getting, what is the reason to disagree for the judge here.

I think you described how employment law works correctly though. non compete clause is hard to enforce in many places and for most jobs maybe save of some super red states.

But I also don’t think that is their primary goal either, I would posit the goal is to “send a message” or “chill employees will to shop for work”

I see. Is this pure fear behind it or is there some evidence that the law is beneficial?

But yeah, another good pretext for harassing the young and/or poors.

Reminds of war on drugs until police started doing to the all “children” in the US and that attitude changed pretty quick.

a market left to its own devices will devolve into monopolies

I would posit it devolves into either slavery or serfdom based on historical records. We all started “in free market” lol

Even regular staunch capitalists recognize that regulation is sometimes necessary.

Most people can’t the differentiate between capitalism and free market on conceptual level

most people aint ready for this one lol

This is a discussion. China behavior is part of the bigger picture.

Are you here just to plug a specific narrative?

My point mainly is why US allowed this to happened, how US got here, and is this not WTO issue, which you are very carefully tip toeing around tho

Could be stalling tactic to appease her handlers… what legal argument is there for blocking this?

Did DoL issue this ruling? I guess could be first post chevron consequence?

I think thats from the article?

From my perspective it looks like US “spent the last 24 years shitting the bed” while enabling this behavior. Again, people who made these decisions are not held accountable.

Fuck china and all but poor leadership is primary reason why we are here… with china being a bad faith actor being no 2.

I don’t see how that is off-topic. If we are having a trade issue, WTO should rule on it so every body knows what is “right”

More preferable to this escalation circle jerk IMHO.

Either way, if do chose this route, then we should call out people who blundered decades of industrial policy that got us here then.

A lot work to worship some dead daddy tbh…

This is the issue, people always need some old man to “lead” them lol

I don’t think this fits here tbh… what is your issue with the above analysis.

Is there any legal argument besides this?

This sounds like a personal opinion lol

Yes it does appear to be that way. Even when Congress does a good thing, it gets stalled or shut down.

Can’t rely on elected officials to deliver proper laws, executive appears to be useless and judges will stop any progress.

How many generations of this now 2 or 3?

Which is great… lower end is who needs income improvement he most.

However, this is not a W overall and neither side is able to really provide any plans how to fix structural issues.

More Perfect Union is another example who is shilling biden recently, i mean i get it… but labor orgs push it too hard, they will lose credibility imho.

Democratic party is not pro labour, neither is Biden. If people can make their choices, i don’t get my these orgs are taking this risk.

Have the courts ever addressed the conflict between “employment at will” and this?

On side, we get rid of you when and how we please…

But you can’t go get another job because “slave master has property interest in you”

It seems like “master” mentality is still very strong within elites.

So they limited supply to our industrial base?

Aint this something that WTO would handle?

I am not here to excuse China’s behavior but this action appears to be part of the trade war that US and EU started… for valid reasons.

We do a lot to make other countries “uncomfortable”, there is nothing special about Chinese behavior here per se.

Let’s not forget that we enabled China’s rise. People within western governments who committed this crime are not held accountable for this blunder.

Now they are gearing us for what appears to be at very least economic conflict but likely a war. This is very concerning.

small concessions to incentivize trade and development of the world.

FYI we don’t do this btw

Funny how these orgs drive public discourse and narrative on both sides.

Then we sit here and argue over it.

there is a limit at what can be done about their activities until we stop commingling personal rights/freedoms with that of a “legal” person

It would require an act of congress and it won’t happen.

They are people when they shill for their owners but they are legal entity when tax man comes.