It looks like exactly 4 characters are missing, so public
and static
would fit, but I never saw static
instead of public static
, so I think you’re right. On the other hand, I don’t use Java anymore and couldn’t be bothered about such details
Rust dev, I enjoy reading and playing games, I also usually like to spend time with friends.
You can reach me on mastodon @[email protected] or telegram @sukhmel@tg
It looks like exactly 4 characters are missing, so public
and static
would fit, but I never saw static
instead of public static
, so I think you’re right. On the other hand, I don’t use Java anymore and couldn’t be bothered about such details
Depends on what was the course about. If it’s about computation, then sure. If it’s about OOP or architecture design (this one I wouldn’t expect, unfortunately, but would be nice if it was taught somewhere), then the point is not just to run something.
I mostly come to prefer composition, this approach apparently even has a wiki page. But that’s in part because I use Rust that forbids inheritance, and don’t have such bullshit (from delegation wiki page):
class A {
void foo() {
// "this" also known under the names "current", "me" and "self" in other languages
this.bar();
}
void bar() {
print("a.bar");
}
}
class B {
private delegate A a; // delegation link
public B(A a) {
this.a = a;
}
void foo() {
a.foo(); // call foo() on the a-instance
}
void bar() {
print("b.bar");
}
}
a = new A();
b = new B(a); // establish delegation between two objects
Calling b.foo() will result in b.bar being printed, since this refers to the original receiver object, b, within the context of a. The resulting ambiguity of this is referred to as object schizophrenia
Translating the implicit this into an explicit parameter, the call (in B, with a a delegate) a.foo() translates to A.foo(b), using the type of a for method resolution, but the delegating object b for the this argument.
Why would one substitute b
as this
when called from b.a
is beyond me, seriously.
Even if it is not their fault, what people see is that they provide bad quality service. Very low percentage ofthem will care to read details when Netflix publishes a post-mortem of an issue, assuming they even do.
I feel like ‘a half is one-third more than a third’ is ambiguous and same as in ‘X is N% more than Y’ one may use X or Y as 100%
I’m sure that one interpretation is more common, but I don’t think that it is exclusively correct
I thought Zaktor wrote “I voted for Harris” how’s that “held back eir vote”?
Only surviving ones
They can also use vague AI-generated ‘meme’ and ask what memes do you see. But they will need to use older and dumber models, current ones make stuff too specific.
What I mean is something like this:
But honestly, I admire the fact that you care about grammar, spelling, and such. This seems not very rare on Lemmy, but is otherwise a rare sight
Would be interesting to take a look through such a window.
But we could put ads during the new moon 🌑→🌚
Got it. I agree that their drivers are (were?) of exemplary bad quality
But I don’t think that it is realistically possible to drop all the proprietary firmware blobs, and if it’s not maybe it’s better to not actively sabotage something to ‘avoid those being feasible’?
Early returns improve readability in that they make it simpler to read, but I also find them decreasing readability in that you may miss an early return and wonder why is execution not hitting the line you expect it to
What’s the reason to avoid binary blob drivers being feasible? Is that about not being able to use non-free binary blobs in kernel? I don’t quite understand what it even is about
It’s just time travellers from original timeline that tried to prevent it, and time travellers from the fucked up resulting timeline that returned to fix everything back to at least what it was
in which case, enjoy your privilege
…for now
Am I right in my understanding that the ‘super high’ turnout of 2020 was still less than 50% of eligible voters? That really looks like maybe a minimum turnout threshold should exist :(
It will do nothing, and I personally don’t think it should be done. But as a thought experiment it shows that saying other authoritarian countries’ citizens that they just ‘didn’t riot hard enough and this are all to blame’ was a bit wrong
Problem is it took Roman empire hundreds of years of decline, the world now sure is faster but it can still take a lot of time for contemporary empires to fall
the secret answer to this is
neither :(