F

F

[deleted]

I mean, considering she had finished 4k by 2018, that is totally doable

Or is the barn itself that swallows

There is a business opportunity there for 0.35 inches Freedom Guns

I want to make a dictionary of expressions like these: “results-oriented person” = “someone that gets results in the shit conditions we provide”

That’s a really interesting case of autological and heterological words

Or ❤️ is a close second in all countries

Random Access Memory could also fit the comic (with some adaptations) because it is an album different from most of Daft Punk discography

I have the same opinion! Once, I had the idea to check the album reviews on reddit, and I was surprised by people not liking it so much. As people commented here, Daft Punk fans do not like it because of the same reason hehe

Há dezenas de nós, dezenas!

I don’t know. It’s missing an arrow pointing at another one. Completely incomprehensible.

Sounds reasonable

Actually, no, but I meant something very different from what I wrote hehe I will edit my comment, thanks!

It could have another panel with “Which one?”

I thought the first link in philosophy was philosophy itself.

Edit: I brainfarted while writing. What I meant is “I thought it would be even more interesting if the first link in philosophy was philosophy itself”.

I love it!

As far as I understand, tit for tat will lose most individual duels. But it does cooperate a lot and makes lots of points as a whole. Proactive strategies win more, but they do not cooperate a lot (especially against each other), and in the end, they make fewer points. In real life, annihilating someone would make others not want to cooperate with you. So the options would be either to annihilate everyone or no one.

A very late comment for you