… bunch of douchebag techbros thinking it’s going to solve all the world’s problems with no side effects…
one doesn’t imagine any of them even remotely thinks a technological panacaea is feasible.
… while they get super rich off it.
because they’re only focusing on this.
oh no, linekar is leaving motd? first wrighty, now him?
i don’t think shearer and micah can pull it off themselves going forward. they’re both good but, let’s face it, neither has the gravitas needed to anchor the show.
i’m not clicking on a reddit link so this assertion may be wrong, but i don’t think the case in the OP has anything to do with trump?
you may be right, but i first heard jimmy carr say it on an episode of qi.
big talk from someone with McSwag in their username!
makes sense. after all, the united kingdom + a lot of rain + an affinity for Ecstasy = UK-Rain-E.
but, hey, we have this super-mega toy that can hallucinate an answer to your esoteric questions for that price!
that’s got to be a bargain, yes?
you’re mixing up trump’s eventual misdeeds with the fact that the usa has undergone a massive transformation towards the right under the eight years of obama.
i’m talking about the seeds which were sown, you’re talking about the harvest which followed. these are two separate things.
each of your assertions have flourished under the manure of the obama tenure – even if they didn’t happen during his presidency.
but, sure. live in denial and give him a pass. just don’t moan when history repeats itself. as a non-american, it’s no skin off my back.
well, one thing i’ll say in his favour: he did kill hitler.
(credit: jimmy carr)
trump may be the iceberg that sinks the ship but people must not forget that it was obama that steered it so expertly there.
whatever he has done in his eight years to engender such deeply entrenched hatred within the populace – so much that even morons like mr. 47 can exploit it so readily – needs to be studied so that it can be avoided in the future.
be like the tree; let the dead leaves drop.
it was smaller than Lemmy is now when I first started using it.
so now we know whom to blame for its enshittification
… there are already a bunch of people who are assuming brand to mean scarification by burning since they evidently only read the headline.
anyone who actually thinks that that headline means literal branding is an illiterate dumbass who needs to read more.
anyone who’s trying to sidestep the dehumanisation of prisoners mentioned in the article by throwing focus solely on the literal meaning of the word brand is an amoral dumbass who needs to understand humanity and history more.
if this were to be true to form, batman would be dangling upside down from the ceiling.
and the next morning, after exchanging fluids intra-species, the two of them would embirth a whole new coronavirus.
oh, so when they say she has a face that launched a thousand ships, they were all just that one boat with a thousand makeovers?!
i would strongly urge you to familiarise yourself with figures of speech lest you’re – you know – branded as an ignorant person.
yep, it wasn’t just a plain tiff.
double-negatives in the headline means a positive article.
…1/1.56", 65mm…
i mean, just report the lens bore diameter in the same metric units as the focal length already.
while you may be right, one would think that the problem lies in the overestimated peception of the abilities of llms leading to misplaced investor confidence – which in turn leads to a bubble ready to burst.