Seems like that’s the case. So do we ignore it because it’s hypocritical?

Huxley warned us that the things we love would kill us but I’d don’t think he thought it would be like this particular case.

I’ll be at the polls. As important as the presidential is this year the locals always have a large impact on a lot of non insignificant things, and sometimes massively significant things, as well as the ballot initiatives. In almost any race I can respect the choice of abstention, but if you don’t show up for at least the ballot initiatives, the closest thing the US has to direct democracy, then I just think you’re not even trying to make democracy work. I know I can’t say the gym isn’t working if I’m not even trying to use the equipment.

let pass harmful legislation before doing that

Of course if you remove words you change the context but that’s entirely grammatically correct and a common use of that phrase. If you wanna dwell on what those words mean in other context go ahead but that’s not saving any trans kids.

If were to assume that EO is Joe fighting back, then he did indeed let those laws pass without fighting back until it was an election season. Context is important and I usually don’t have to explain every word like its a middle school English class unless I’m responding to republicans reading my statements in bad faith.

Let’s get pedantic and semantic then shall we. https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/let-pass

The context was always how much was he wiling to allow before he responded and the answer is a lot.

How many states did he let pass harmful legislation before doing that? Or was the plan always to wait until the election cycle for that order? An election cycle EO that can’t pass the courts is indeed almost nothing.

Biden was never much of a fighter. He’s done almost nothing to help while dozens of states pass anti trans legislature. But hey he made it so trans people can join the military again, if they can survive their state that is.

Id follow that logic right up until the part where rich people get consequences. No one is more prepared for either outcome of the election then they are. Democrat fundraising was all time high under Trump, Biden may see his personal fundraising go up and his stocks grow if he loses. No one is less invested in the real consequences of their own actions then politicians.

Far too many of these kids are about to make a decision both they and whoever said that quote in earnest aren’t ready for. Enjoy your shiny new suicide rate Wyoming.

When a brain wormed, dog eating, sexual assaulter isn’t even the worst candidate in the election your know you’re in America baby.

I don’t really think it’s ‘the quiet part’ anymore if it’s been explicitly legalized. At this point its just ‘the part’ because the consolidated power is already here right now.

He should do both. Abuse his new powers to somehow cause a sever detriment to Trump or Fascism or both, then be like ‘Oh im not the guy for the next four years.’ It would literally be having your cake and eating it two. Biden actual having balls and Biden stepping aside are both moves that will more than likely track super hard with anyone who’s not already locked for Trump.

Scorch Trumps earth then drop the mic and the chances they call for a Democratic encore will skyrocket I’d bet.

To me I feel like they get the best deal, because the risk of both blindness and other complications from poorly managed diabetes is still much worse than this.

Its the people using this because they don’t want to make changes that are within their power but are difficult who are taking on additional risk for no reason other than convenience. That doesn’t mean everyone who doesn’t have diabetes but still makes up a large portion of the buyers of this drug.

I want the power Obama had. The power to overthrow an entire nation based on nothing but economic fears and leave in it’s place an open air slave state, then have people who claim to not like war think your biggest scandal is the color of your damn suit. Just doing an oopsie in Libya, whoopsie daisy.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/biden-supreme-court-reform-trump-immunity-1235051044/

I hate when people use the original version of that rule because it’s never a good lense. The original should be ‘Never attribute to stupidity what can be attributed to profit’, or do people really think the world is run by idiots who just accidentally managed to profit off of every single time things got worse.

Bidens guys already came out saying they don’t want to reform the Supreme Court. It’s not on the ballot this cycle.

If you dont try to fight fascism with every tool avaliable and legal to you, then you’re a fascist. There’s no if and or buts about it. Biden could take steps to counter fascism but instead he make committments to explicitly not fight it using the new SCOTUS ruling and even not to change the courts.

Even if he wins, in 4 years were going to be right back to fascism because he is explicitly refusing to fix this. Hes unfit to fight fascism which means hes unfit to be president in the modern US.

Leaving unused options on the table then turning the country over to a fascist is a lot like being the guy who sits at the table with fascists and if Biden loses without trying something Im gonna call him that.

Would be a reaaaal shame if someone interpreted this as a threat to the rule of law that necessitated some kind of presidential act. There’s gotta be plenty of realistic ways to fuck with him in an official capacity.

Disaster is a matter of opinion, a simple difference in taste. I like the ending because then he went to prison.