Yeah I’d agree. I guess anyone just sounds more assertive than some. Perhaps I should have said most.
Yeah I’d agree. I guess anyone just sounds more assertive than some. Perhaps I should have said most.
I’ve dealt with xmpp and matrix and I far prefer using matrix tbh. XML is shit in all cases except prompting llms.
Not even stealthily they just required some device validation bullshit iirc. Basically they require the ROM is signed by a Google certificate. They don’t do that for custom roms even GrapheneOS after the android dev team request they get added multiple times.
I’m on GrapheneOS so RCS isn’t a solution for me.
I’m looking forward to the day when I confederate my own fucking messaging server. But I doubt that’ll ever come.
I think a lot of the fediverse should introduce Matrix as part of their deployment for private messages directly.
Okay, hear me out, but I think it’s actually beneficial.
Your content itself is encrypted, e2e so u don’t need to worry about that.
The signal protocol has recently introduced sealed sender. sealed sender is completely useless if all communications are going through a centralised server, such as the signal server (You can deanonimise senders easily). If the traffic travels across multiple servers with sealed sender, then it is theoretically impossible to reveal who the sender is unless you have communications with that other server give u info on who the sender was. So if you trust signal not to be collecting your metadata, then you must also trust them, not to be giving your metadata to metadata.
I think that’s only the case for people on a meta client. I would assume for people on a signal client get their requests proxied to meta via a signal server.
Isn’t the whole point of E2E encryption that it doesn’t matter. And since signal has recently implemented sealed sender. Sending your communication to someone on a Facebook server might actually be more secure.
Well except that RCS is locked up by Google. I don’t believe there are any foss implementations.
Don’t u need an existing email to bootstrap that process.
Doesn’t someone own the copyright and thus get royalties from the new one as opposed to the good ol rainbow.
The second one, I don’t see why you shouldn’t be allowed to do that. Travel by plane is by far the safest form of transport. The TSA is actually like 90% ineffective. I mean if you do actually make a joke like that they’ll tackle you to the ground and most likely shoot you but let’s not let reality get in the way of a good philosophical discussion.
I’d argue that there is no way you could ever come to a common understanding of what is hurtful.
It’s not that we’re more individualistic than we used to be, it’s just that we’re now exposed to the entire global consciousness.
I would probably define absolute free speech the same way you did. I’ve given you my definition of free speech. And some people call my definition absolute.
Depends who says it. If Joe shmoe says it on Lemmy then id say its fine. If someone said it televised (and where knowledgeable of it being televised, if they are not then its the person televising it who is making it actionable and thus their fault) then it’s actionable and thus u can’t say it.
I’d say the sentence is a direct incitement of violence. But its not always actionable.
I doubt that most of them have the same interpretation of absolutists in this context that you do.
I get called a free speech absolutist because I believe that you should be able to say anything that is not a direct incitement to actionable violence. Some would call that absolutist, I would not.
I guess you could argue Karl Popper’s paradox of tolerance would be an unsolvable logical error that would result.
But also I would argue that anyone who is calling anyone else a free speech absolutist is misunderstanding what that other person stands for.
I find ur existence is harmful to my mental state. Therefore u existing is in violation of this rule.
I like the idea but it had flaws
I can’t believe nobody saw this coming.
Jesus guys what did u expect.
Synching has dropped android support as well unfortunately
My argument is that plane travel is this safe despite TSA being so hopeless therefore the use of such speech will have no effect on actual safety and restricting it is an unnecessary restriction of liberty for no actual reason.