I don’t think that dreams are a good threshold. Mostly based on personal anecdote - sometimes I dream with random stuff in Talian, for example, and I’m definitively not proficient in it. (Including some shitty bilingual jokes, like an angry pig surrounded by bananas praying to the sky.)

I wish that I had enough drawing skills to do this, but:

Imagine obese (morbidly so) versions of Mario and Pikachu. Both with blood on their mouths, and faces that strongly remind Goya’s “Saturn Devouring His Son”. Mario holds half of the body of a dead Tanzee (a Palworld pal), and is strongly implied to be eating it; Pikachu does it with the Yuzu logo, or something else.

There are only three things written in the whole picture.

• Top right corner: Nintendo’s logo.
• Centre bottom: “we were starving”, followed by “私たち二人は飢えていました。” (ditto; might as well check the grammar as I don’t speak JP, I used a machine translator).

ich habe noch kein einziges “du hast mich” bis jetzt

Auch weil alles Liebe in Lemmy ist, ja? /witz

People with no friends confirmed as nihillingual. /s

[Caveat lector: I’m not from language acquisition, my main area of knowledge within Linguistics is Historical Linguistics.]

Native proficiency is a result of a language acquisition ability that is not well understood and disappears early into child development.

That’s the critical period hypothesis. It’s more complicated than it looks like, and academically divisive; some say that it’s simply the result of people having higher exposure and incentive to learn a language before they’re 12yo, while some claim that it’s due to changes in cerebral structures over time.

And then there’s people like Chomsky who claim that the so-called “window of opportunity” is to learn Language as a human faculty, not to learn a specific language like Mandarin, Spanish, English etc.

It’s complicated; different people put the cut-off point in different places. And to complicate it further language proficiency isn’t just one but at least two (production vs. reception), if not four (hearing, speaking, reading, writing).

That said, in my personal and subjective view, a person is proficient enough in a language to say “I speak it” when they’re able to use it for a simple conversation about a topic that they know, without too much effort or reliance on external tools.

Se hablás castellano entonces complica, ya que no hablo. Excepto cuando borracho*. Aún asi, no es castellano, es más como portitañol…

*de veras, che. Una vodca hoy sería genial.

Du irrst dich, Brudi - niemand spricht Deutsch hier.

And when you do use those ⟨U⟩ (I do), people assume that you know what’s going on in the UK (I don’t.).

No, it’s roughly 20% (297M/1537M). Source.

“So, those guys generate positive advertisement for our games. How do we stop it, and make sure that public opinion shifts to «Nintendo is cringe and you’re a loser if you play this shit»?”

Also, what the fuck is with Japanese law, criminalising modding?

I’d consider growing those. Mostly to blend alongside some extremely hot pepper, as then I can control the heat properly.

Well, at least here we can talk about Voldemort without evoking him, right? (Unless this shit is like Betelgeuse - on the third time you mention his name, he pops up to ruin your day.)

Okay, serious now: that’s sensible since in r/brasil it would be basically advertisement.

We’re talking about two different problems.

The one that I’m talking about is Reddit admins being clearly hostile towards the community, including mods, and the mods still being willing to lick the admins’ boots, instead of migrating their comms to another site. Even at the expense of the userbases of the subreddits that they moderate.

Here in Lemmy this shit does not roll - both because it’s easier to migrate comms across instances, and because the userbase is mostly composed of people with low tolerance towards admin abuse.

Now, regarding the problem that you’ve spotted: yes, it is a problem here that boils down to

1. Lack of transparency: plenty mods and admins here have a nasty tendency to enforce hidden rules - because actually writing those rules down would piss off the userbase.
2. Excessive polarisation and oversimplification of some topics, mostly dealing with recent events. (Such as the one that we both were talking about not too long ago.)

I am really not sure on how to compare the extent of both issues in Lemmy vs. Reddit, nor how to address them here, and thus to get rid of the problem that you’re noticing.

For a casual observer, who was never engaged with that platform, it might actually look like Reddit is back to normal, based on a casual glance at the activity.

You only notice the cracks leaking water when you actually look closer, and you remember that the stone dam didn’t have so many of them. The surge on bot activity, the lower level of discourse in the comments, the further concentration of activity into larger subs, the content feeling more and more repetitive…

That’s hilarious. And surprisingly uplifting if the alt-right sub in question is r/brasillivre, since that shithole is still empty.

May I be blunt? I don’t think that anyone still moderating Reddit has a shred of dignity, decency, or concern about their userbase. As such this shit will pass and nobody there will care.

Just to be clear I’ll define two things:

• “knowledge” - info available to the person from memory; or to the group, through their common channels of interaction. The opposite of “ignorance”.
• “intelligence” - ability to use said information to produce logically correct and relevant statements.

This is important here because, even if your complain is worded as Lemmy being less intelligent, you’re clearly complaining about lack of knowledge - cue to “I always learn new stuff” and references to the complexity of registration (i.e. the knowledge necessary to navigate through it).

With that out of way:

Lemmy’s knowledge is mostly impaired by a small userbase. It’s great when it comes to a few topics, such as technology or specific lines of political thinking; but once you go past that it’s hard to find a lot of stuff here. This is not does not mean that the individual users are ignorant - sometimes you know something but there’s simply no room to convey it.

Intelligence-wise, however, I disagree with you. Don’t get me wrong, a lot of Lemmy users are braindead trash that would genuinely believe that 50 is 100 because it is not 0, eager to vomit “ackshyually” (a sign of knowledge and stupidity), fallacious as a brick, so goes on; however, they’re proportionally less of an issue than the morons that you’d find in Twitter, Facebook, Reddit etc.

“Hic est aedus!” “«Aedus»?? Haedus uel aedes?” “Sic.”

[“There’s a goom here!” “«Goom»?? A goat, or a room?” “Yup, that’s it.”]

…okay the joke doesn’t work when translated.

I should’ve taken spelling-based transcription errors into account; my bad! (This happens a lot, even among professional linguists.)

Variety-wise odds are that you speak the Caipira dialect, given the region of origin. Or potentially a mixed dialect. Either way it’s [i u] all the way in MG, and almost all the way in SP.