Ah, in my mind there was an odd number of EC electors so an even split wasn’t possible without 3rd party electors.
Just this guy, you know?
Ah, in my mind there was an odd number of EC electors so an even split wasn’t possible without 3rd party electors.
How is a third party winning any EC delegates?
I’m not suddenly about to put a Harris billboard on my lawn
Do they have billboards saying “reluctantly voting Harris out of necessity”?
The distinction between “government regulation” on one hand and “community-devised rules, local monitoring and graduated sanctions for rule violations” on the other seems entirely artificial to me. In both cases rules and enforcement are set up to avoid the tragedy. The latter just uses more feel-good words to describe local government.
If you get a sane voting system out of all this then it just might have all been worth it. But it’s not how I would have gone about getting there…
The two party system is an inevitable consequence of the FPTP election system. Replace that, and you can have multiple parties. Otherwise, you might get a short period of chaos with multiple parties which then settles down to the two winners.
It wouldn’t have worked. You’d never have gotten every single last case and then the exponential growth would have started again. Or, if that had somehow magically worked, the virus would have come back from outside.
There were no simple solutions.
This is a good read: https://ourworldindata.org/un-population-2024-revision
The new estimated global peak population is 10.3B in 2084. But now, looking at the break down by region, you may be talking about North America? That graph looks wildly 3rd world… If you edit the graph to show US and Nigeria’s 2024 projections side by side it’s samepicture.jpg
Go home Clippy, you’re drunk
“Algorithmic timeline” might be appropriately specific?
We live in a post-truthiness world. Nobody cares any more if the lies seem plausible.
Just lie and then do it anyway. It worked to corrupt SCOTUS, it should work here.
SpaceX has one viable product
Two. I can’t even figure out whether you’re ignoring Starlink or their space launch business. But yeah, the Elonville on Mars obsession makes about as much sense as the Cybertruck.
Or are FlyingSquid a collective consciousness wielding more limbs for typing than any singular human?
There you go conflating Jews and Israel. Apart from that you have an arguable point.
No, please don’t split the vote against FPTP. That’s how you get more FPTP.
Probability is useful because it can make predictions that can be tested against reality.
Yes. But you’d have to run the test repeatedly and see if the outcome, i.e. Clinton winning, happens as often as the model predicts.
But we only get to run an election once. And there is no guarantee that the most likely outcome will happen on the first try.
I believe you dropped an important “not”