You just admitted that your reading skill is so poor, you can’t even pick up the obvious subtext of your own words
You just admitted that your reading skill is so poor, you can’t even pick up the obvious subtext of your own words
So your argument is that people don’t care about reading?
I hope you realise that this actually weakens your point
Think differently from me… hmm. The opinion I’m defending is that books can move you. No, I will not entertain the notion that books can’t be moving.
I also didn’t say you made any value judgments about anything. I said you bragged, because your statement indeed comes across as an attempt to brag. Not a good one, though, of course.
Also, im not “defending literature interpretation”.
Imagine actually admitting this
Now imagine somehow bragging about it
It boggles the mind
I wonder how the tankies will try to spin this. Putin is as far from communist as a person can get. Surely the tankies won’t continue to claim that NK is even remotely socialist.
Chicken tikka masala is literally the national dish. I don’t get it either.
So now you’re concerned with “looking cool”. Your priorities are very strange.
“No. But, in a snarky tone yes.”
Fuck “morality”. Morality has a well-known progressive bias.
Idk about any need for payment, I just installed it with PIP and started using it right away
What about SimpleGUI?
“Without chemicals”
Okay, no need to take this seriously.
Are you trying to say NASA hires “too many women, LGBTs and brown people”, and that this is holding them back?
Is there something about straight, white cis males that makes them better at rocket science?
Queerbaiting is absolutrly a thing, and worth being annoyed at. If a show constantly hints that two same-sex people are gay for each other, then never actually follows through, that’s annoying.
I don’t understand why, legally speaking, a distinction is made.
You don’t understand why the law distinguishes between a piece of digital art and Photoshop itself? Come on, dude.
That is a highly ideological thing to say.
And clearly you’re so poorly-versed in literature theory that you’ve never heard of unintented subtext.