huntrss

I can relate …

Thanks

Hi, thanks for your post. Can you provide links to the projects so that I can check them out more closely?

At least it’s still original taste …

It’s so human how - instead of admitting its error - it’s pulling this bs right out of its ass 🤣

Didn’t read all, however, thanks for sharing. Made me laugh and I certainly needed a good laugh today

C’mon, a little bit of flexing is so nice.

But, I get what you’re saying. I usually filter out this bullshit (because I’m a Rustacean myself 😜) but this doesn’t mean that it is as easy for someone else as it is for me.

I think they also live after the mantra “move fast and break things”, in cars that literally means breaking bones.

Fair enough. There are pretty pedantic processes to qualify automotive software, but these are obviously not perfect and bad quality software may still be deployed to the cars.

However, I would not throw OEMs like Tesla and others into the same category regarding Software quality.

How do you mean this?

Automotive, Aerospace. Everywhere where you need safety qualifiable software (safety as in ISO 26262 or equivalent)