Slay the Spire is a card based video game.
Slay the Spire is a card based video game.
Another Axios ‘scoop’ to make Israel look good. And would you look at that. It is written by Barak Ravid
One year after Oct. 7 attacks, Netanyahu is on a winning streak.” So reads the title of a recent Axios article describing the Israeli prime minister riding on an unbeatable wave of triumphs.
These stunning military “successes,” its author Barak Ravid notes, include the bombing of Yemen, the assassinations of Hamas chief Ismail Haniyeh and Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, and the pager attack against Lebanon.
The same author recently went viral for an article that claimed that Israeli attacks against Hezbollah are “not intended to lead to war but are an attempt to reach ‘de-escalation through escalation.'” Users on social media mocked Ravid for this bizarre, Orwellian reasoning. But what almost everybody missed is that Barak Ravid is an Israeli spy – or at least he was until recently.
Ravid is a former analyst with Israeli spying agency Unit 8200, and as recently as last year, was still a reservist with the Israeli Defense Forces group.
FN key on quadruple duty
Get rid of the FTC and NHTSA and boom. They don’t have to work and he can sell them.
Reminder that this is happening right now under Joe Biden.
“This is not an occasional thing. This was day after day after day operating on children who would say, ‘I was lying on the ground after a bomb dropped and this quadcopter came down and hovered over me and shot me’.”
Thanks Biden.
The videos used in mainstream media were taken from Twitter and then wrongly subtitled. A Youtube video from a child came out which showed what really happened that night. https://youtu.be/ySHIOYyJ95A
Mainstream media is lying so much that a child without credentials is more credible.
What I cannot believe is MAGA is revolting against the Marco Rubio pick.
Conspiracy nuts are more critical of their glorious leader than Democrats.
Sure thing. But that is not what OP was insinuating with his original argument.
In my opinion, talking about women ‘withholding’ sex as a ‘punishment’ implies a certain level of expectation or entitlement, like men are entitled to have sex with women
No they are not entitled. But the poster specifically instructs people to withhold sex. Even if the woman wants to have sex. This could make sense if the woman was having sex with someone who opposes the ownership of their bodies. But if the man already holds their point of view, what is the point? For who are they not having sex? What is being achieved?
Unless you put them in the dishwasher
Nice to see the boycott W’s rolling in. They are not saying it publicly for fear of reprisal. But you know companies are not eyeing investing in Israel because of the blow back.
For anyone who wants to participate: the “No-Thanks” app is great. If you cannot avoid all brands, avoid the things you do not care about as much.
I am not sure the passport photo was on his phone. The picture is of the daughter of Gantz who suicided (or “suicided”?). It is difficult to understand what is implied.
The threadreader link in the post contains more info but requires a Twitter account to see photos. So I put some in here. Here is some of the text from Threadreader:
Explain the secret relationship between Adi Sabag and Gallant in the red bed room on the 16th floor of Matcal Tower and the leak of some classified data by Gallant and the online spying of Adi’s mobile at that moment?
Explain the secret relationship between Netanyahu’s trusted doctor and Benny Gantz at the Savoy Hotel in London and the transfer of some confidential data from Bibi to Gantz by that doctor?
The suicide of Noga, Gantz’s daughter, after hearing the story of her father’s secret relationship, who was only looking for more information from Bibi!”
There is no Jewish conspiracy. There is a Zionist conspiracy. Take away Israels antisemitism shield and the allegations make a lot of sense. The problem is that the people Israel tries to shove the blame on have nothing to do with it.
But this is about instructing women to withhold sex from men as a means to achieve their societal goals.
This does not make sense because It is counterproductive to punish people who already agree with your point of view.
Nobody said women owed anything. They are saying that collectively punishing men for things they did not do is a fast track to creating more incels.
You are not understanding the argument.
Let’s say two people are regularly having sex with consent. And man already agrees with her on the issues listed above.
Then OOP pops up and says she should not have sex with him to get her rights back.
Explain to me how not having sex with the man will get her rights back? He already supports them.