Whoever disagrees on anything with Trump or is too weak to defend themselves when he needs a scapegoat for his failures.
that’s all held by the executive
From now on, that’ll all be handled by the most rabid capitol rioters. If they demonstrate their loyalty by murdering undesirable political figures, the president will throw around pardons like it’s his main competence.
and only Congress can unfuck us with impeachment
Yeah, how’s that been working out so far?
So in other words, Trump can do whatever he wants as long as his cronies vote that it’s okay.
The question wasn’t “what came first - the chicken or the chicken egg?” The first chicken hatched from AN egg. Question answered.
Ooooh no. A government position would imply at least a shred of accountability. They’d lobby for privatisation. Failing that, they’d bribe the officials in charge to run the whole system into the ground so that they can argue a private entrepreneur could run it more efficiently, and then they’d do it with as little oversight as they can buy from their legislators.
The problem here is that it would reward the government for either a) punishing criminals but also b) framing innocents with the goal of taking their money. We’re seeing how well that works with the private prison industrial complex. In essence, it just creates an industry of creating criminals where there were none.
Punishing criminals severely is great. Making it a business will end up with the worst kind of people optimising the revenue from it.
At least you won’t have that particular problem again until you read about somebody who sneezed someone else’s intestines out of his body.
What? Now you can’t even turn the country into an absolutist dictatorship anymore? I thought this was AMERICA! Political correctness gone overboard!
Cars are useful. Cars protect children in many situations. Cars are among the things that majorly contribute to even having a food supply. Cars freedom patriotism eagles liberty-gasm!
Yet it is still possible to have cars serve those functions without giving in to the lobbies that wish to make it mandatory to get paid for shoving a car down the throat of every loony who wants one to hurt others with. Because cars are well regulated to make them as safe as possible.
Mention the concept of a daily stand-up pledge of allegiance in schools in any other democracy and get laughed at.
Sorry, but no compassion from me: shouldn’t have built the road right under a lava stream. Stupid decision, really.
That sounds like the millions of doctored amazon reviews and social media bot-boosted content should be dealt with by next week then.
100000 “users” then popped up and left the same glowing 5-star review > must be a great site.
That’s what Sven in the basement is for. I assume his name is Sven. Might ask him sometime.
If you can prove that influencing the testimony was the intention behind it and if you can furthermore prove that he himself did it.
If he says the magic words “nope, the timing and the people benefiting from it were pure coincidences” and “I knew nothing, it was once again that one criminal underling whom I don’t even know despite him having been my fixer for years”, historically he gets away with it with very few exceptions.
Hey! HEY! I resent that remark - yeah, sure, maybe it is exactly that, BUT it is also at least in equal parts an attempt to shove ads down the throats of customers who are rendered helpless to resist by the factor you mentioned.
“Well, you can’t prevent all assaults in the world, so why shouldn’t I punch you in the face now?” is a rather defeatist point of view.
Not the breed, the institution holding the competition.