Lemmy shouldn’t have avatars, banners, or bios

  • 2 Posts
  • 113 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 3rd, 2023

help-circle


  • It isn’t censorship if you can just turn it off and see everything. It’s a warning for people who want to browse at work but not view content that can get them in trouble

    Just turn it off and ignore it if it doesn’t apply to you. The rest of us want the tag to be used for its purpose.


  • Aa!@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldNSFW Tag for drug use?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Which you can easily turn off if you don’t browse Lemmy at work.

    Just because you don’t use the tag for its intended purpose doesn’t mean everyone doesn’t. The tag has a clear purpose, denoted by what it stands for. Most people with adult jobs understand its purpose. Don’t ruin the tag’s purpose for the rest of us by devaluing it



  • Aa!@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldNSFW Tag for drug use?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    The tag is for warning people browsing at work not to click… Using it to prevent someone from clicking on a post that would be unacceptable to read at the workplace is exactly what it’s for

    It’s not like it’s censorship, it’s just a warning tag.


  • Aa!@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldNSFW Tag for drug use?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    What do you think the tag is for?

    People at work don’t (shouldn’t) click on NSFW-tagged content. If it draws your eye even more, then I assume you don’t browse from work.

    How would it defeat the purpose to tag content that most workplaces would not be okay with? If you don’t mind seeing the content, then the tag might entice you. People at work will recognize it and not click


  • Aa!@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldNSFW Tag for drug use?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    The NSFW tag is part of the mechanism to curate the feed.

    I’m not sure why people get offended by people wanting to use social media but not wanting to view content that can get them fired. If the content doesn’t bother you, then you shouldn’t filter NSFW content. It’s not like the NSFW tag is censoring the content and preventing you from seeing it if you click it.

    For people with jobs, why not make it easier to filter the things that companies don’t like? It doesn’t affect you any.





  • You’re arguing opinions and trying to convince someone as if they are facts. There’s plenty to criticize about how AI is used, but it is a valuable tool for those that use it.

    The amount of value it provides is very subjective, and even if you don’t find it useful, many others do. You might as well be trying to argue that you don’t like photography because it doesn’t provide the same experience of drawings and paintings. You wouldn’t be wrong to feel that way, but you would be wrong to tell someone else that they need to feel the way you do.









  • I’m mostly thinking about before the days of “swipe right/swipe left” but you put in information about your personality and you got recommendations based on that.

    It wasn’t so frantic or based on getting every match you could get, it was about getting matches that were most likely to click with you.