Reading Marx is like reading Scripture, huh?
Reading Marx is like reading Scripture, huh?
Who allied up with the Nazis to invade Poland?
The context was factory farming in general and cows in particular. I’m glad you didn’t kill the animals your family raised, though!
Cattle are artificially inseminated when farmers want more, they don’t get put all together
Wow those are three wildly different definitions lolol
Because you don’t have a position, hence why you just whine about being victimized like the bad-faith conservative you are instead of re-iterating or clarifying anything. Go ahead and claim I’ve committed another formal fallacy on an informal discussion site instead of using your words like an adult, you commies are all so predictable smh. Materialism really does lend itself to anti-intellectuals who think they’re so smart, doesn’t it?
this, too, does not change the truth of what i’ve said
That’s true, because what you said holds no truth at all. I pointed out the flaws in your point and your “argument” was that since no one is vegan, veganism isn’t better for the environment. Which is so monumentally stupid I’m convinced you’re trolling.
“The vast majority of people are not communist, therefore communism wouldn’t be better for workers.”
“The world isn’t powered by renewables, therefore renewables aren’t better than coal.”
“Things aren’t currently better, so no change would make it better.”
You’re arguing from a position of complete nonsense, and it’s not an “appeal to ridicule” to call out bad logic and sealioning tactics. Link literally any source that backs your conservative, status-quo reinforcing position, or go read something other then century old rich men philosophizing about societies they daydreamed up.
You’ve said nothing except for flat denial and asserting illogical nonsense lol
Go back to talking about cryptocurrency and communism, because that has definitely resulted in material improvements for people.
You have made no points to refute, and ridicule is how you handle low effort trolls.
Thankfully, facts are true whether you believe them or not.
Lol you’re fucking hilarious, I thought the self-professed communist would appreciate advocating for a better system but it turns out you’re just a goofball
I said more than that, your “rebuttal” isn’t a rebuttal either, it’s word vomit and an appeal to futility.
If you’re trolling, then 10/10
Saying you’re disappointed with what girls do to their bodies is mad weird, though
Lmfao that’s your argument?? It’s in “not even wrong” territory, literally what on earth are you talking about lol
Coal pollution is also higher now than when renewable energy was first invented, therefore renewables wouldn’t help us! /s
If the country doesn’t become communist, calling yourself communist has done no good.
Being vegan requires less production. And animal waste, runoff, and methane are all major sources of pollution that being vegan eliminates. It takes less water, land, and plants for a vegan diet than it does to feed animals for agriculture.
My point is proven science, you didn’t ask for a source you just claimed the opposite, so you’re on the same footing as me.
Except for my point is obvious, between the methane and animal waste run off, the water required for animal agriculture, the waste products unused from meat production, and the fact that you have to grow even more plants to feed the animals instead of eating the plants directly, I don’t see why on earth you wouldn’t see how being vegan has a smaller footprint.
Read a scientific study in-between your theory, sometime.
Lol You didn’t provide a rebuttal to my claim either
Changing “he” to “they” isn’t a political change, or shouldn’t be if you’re not a fucking shithead