Ah, so you see a lot of efforts to fight rapists? I don’t, on the contrary most celebrities are now linked to some form of sexual assault and everyone defends them.
Also, if we were to do both, please explain to me how showing gender as such a major thing that you need to discriminate based on it, would make anything better in a world where rapists would actually be fought against,
No need to reach as far as islam, with every rape story you have a crowd of shits that rush screaming “she wouldn’t have been raped if she wore proper clothes” and the like. The simple facts that rape victims feel ashamed to even talk about it shows that there is a big problem of defending rapists rather than victims, and the victims are instead shown as the cause of the assault.
Instead of fighting rapists, let’s segregate women and men
You can have beliefs. But most religions are actively anti-LGBT, so you are in a bit of a pickle here. Associating yourself with an intolerant group is going to attract hostility for people who fight intolerance. And the paradoxical situation you seem to be here leaves you on the wrong side of both sides.
If your beliefs are proper beliefs (and not weird crap from religions) no atheist can ever have an argument against that.
Once again, I hope for you that people who see you as a monster don’t think the same.
No matter the context, I stand by my point.
A necessary evil is still evil, that’s a sad truth but it doesn’t make it more moral.
I never said they are not useful or necessary. But I refuse to consider murder to be something heroic. Now if your moral structure allows you to consider that killing can be good, I just hope for you that people who don’t like you don’t think the same.
Professional killers are not heroes.
People who get offended by a behaviour that doesn’t affect them at all
Sure, brainwashing people into accepting to be an instrument of violence directed by a government, in a time of growing fascism, sounds like an amazing idea.
Why not start with kids while we’re at it?
Principle of charity: never assume evil intent when stupidity is as likely of an explanation.
Or in other words: humans tend to be incredibly stupid, rather than actually evil.
Well let’s send all of the far right from Europe to America, and all the “woke” from America to Europe. This way when the country bursts into flames it won’t bring the rest of the world with it.
Or would Americans be racist against fellow, but foreign far right extremist?
Trump’s 24-hours war solving: “Ukraine is now part of Russia”
But considering the obvious lack of knowledge around AIs, it should have.
You did, and if it wasn’t intentional then you’re the one needing a better education. Actually, this is probably so basic that it’s not usually taught.
Ah yes sorry, you said that Trump was actually less or equal of a threat for survival than Harris.
“If it was possible with A, then it is possible with B” implies that B is less restrictive than A. Which in this case means that you said that surviving Harris is more/as hard as surviving Trump.
You can’t do the “it’s not what I said, calm down bro” lie on a written conversation.
A guy who wants the death of many people and goes more and more insane/senile being put at the head of a country after multiple comments admitting that he’d like to form a dictatorship is, for you, the same as an averagely crappy politician being elected?
At Hitler’s election would you have said “heh, minorities had it hard before, but they’ll survive” too?
What a stupid comment.
The term boomer refers to a mentality, not to the generation anymore.
By the current use of the term, yes, they all are, as this use refers to people who refuse change out of irrational belief that old times were better, glorify a violent and fascist past, and deny the existence of modern science because they refuse to adapt their obsolete lifestyle.