Because… why would mass murderers lie? That’d be naughty, they would never do that!

Just because a cable like that blows y’alls fuses?!

Even the sketches from up north are presented sadly and a tad depressing

“oy, where’s my change?” “What change?” “For the money I gave you” “Besides payment for your 10 Dollar Lemonade special offer, I didn’t get any.” “But the sign says 1,50!” 1And a nice day to you, too" “Wait! I want my…” “I said: A nice day, Sir.”

But they don’t want you to switch to “the new cool stuff”. They want you to switch to “the ad serving platform”

I feel you, brother. Come on over and crack a nice and sparkly 9v with me.

We’d have to ask the Supreme Court if that’s the case and the way those “super neutral judges” act… maybe we wait until after the election for that one.

That’s what happens around any toilet in a 2km radius when Taco Bell has a major sale.

If Donald is immune, isn’t Kamala immune if she orders the FBI to throw him in the brig if (please, don’t fuck this up! VOTE!) she becomes president?

I got to backpedal a little here. This is the file: https://www.printables.com/de/model/163302-worlds-best-css-developer-trophy I mixed it up with this one, which is actually a joke about misbehaving 3d printers: https://www.printables.com/de/model/195629-3d-printing-trophy-layer-shifting

Knowing the original model, that’s less funny than the OG one.

Same in German.

I mean… Have you tried?

Everyday I’m javelin

How are you getting change?

What good is cash gonna do if the networked cash register doesn’t open anymore?

standing on the shoulders of giants.

See, Netflix? You don’t need to ramble on for two seasons to tell a fucking Story.

Many of the machines in question will have safe mode walled off for security reasons anyway.

I really have a hard time deciding if that is the scandal the article makes it out to be (although there is some backpedaling going on). The crucial point is: 8% of the decisions turn out to be wrong or misjudged. The article seems to want us to think that the use of the algorithm is to blame. Yet, is it? Is there evidence that a human would have judged those cases differently? Is there evidence that the algorithm does a worse job than humans? If not, then the article devolves onto blatant fear mongering and the message turns from “algorithm is to blame for deaths” into “algorithm unable to predict the future in 100% of cases”, which of course it can’t…